Hobbes believe in the Absolutism of government and absolute monarchy while locke on the other hand believe in a representative government of State-building .
<h3>How the approach of hobbes and locke and their ideal forms of government differs?</h3>
Their approach differs because the first is about absolutism, which is a political doctrine which believe in the vesting power into a monarch.
While the later is about State-building , which believe in the system of making the state affairs collectively, however i support the later.
learn more about government at:brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ1
Sadducees were more affluent and were also more sympathetic to the Hellenistic movement. They acquiesced quite a bit to the influence of the prevailing powers (Greece, and then Rome) because they realized it was economically and politically advantageous for them to do so. They also only held the Pentateuch as their authoritative Scriptures.
Essenes held themselves to a higher standard of piety - including voluntary poverty, abstinence, and other forms and degrees of asceticism. Additionally, they lived in a tighter community (Jerusalem had an "Essene Quarter") and may have influenced the early Christian community (of Acts 1-11). Some of them took a more radical approach on this communalism and established the community of Qumran.
He helped to stop child labor laws from being inhumane or harmful. Since the employers only cared about getting profit.
States in deep south broke away so they could continue slavery but states in upper south supported ending it
The first member of the Fujiwara Clan was Nakatomi no Katamari. He was a close friend of Emperor Tenji and supported him in his efforts of further centralizing and increasing the authority of the imperial government. Because of this, the Emperor granted him the highest charge in his court and gave him the Fujiwara surname. This clan managed to dominate the Japanese Imperial power for centuries by the practice of marrying their daughters to every emperor. Because of the family tradition of future emperors being raised in the household of the mother and having to be loyal to their maternal grandfather, they were always able to perpetuate their dominance through marriages with every future Emperor.