The things that best describe the purpose of the words "meagre," "scaffold," "stern," and "punishment of death" is that they impart a judgmental, reproachful mood. Thus, the correct option is A.
<h3>What is the purpose of any word?</h3>
The purpose of each and every word in literature depicts the feelings, emotions, thoughts, ideas, and many more that the people usually convey to each other in a precise manner. Every word makes sense according to the context.
The word mentioned above best describes the circumstance of hypercritical approach and command throughout the given passage.
Therefore, the correct option for this question is A.
To learn more about Meagre, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/4532172
#SPJ1
Unlike most animals, they're enjoyable. They don't do anything but sing til they die. They're calm, peaceful, and beautiful. Mockingbirds are nothing but amazing. It's a sin to kill a mockingbird just like it's a sin to kill a unicorn. To kill something so pure and harmless is horrible. That's why it's a sin to kill a mocking bird.
i hope this helps :^)
The argument is that the original US Constitution did not intend for African slaves to be “citizens” of the United States. It is historically false since as dissenter justices Curtis and McLean stated, five of the original 13 states had a sizable minority of free black men who were citizens that could also vote in federal and state elections. Now that being established, the correct answer should be “hasty generalization” since the argument pretends that all citizens, at the time of the ratification of the constitution were white and that only these "all white" citizens were able to vote which is historically false. It could not be a genetic fallacy since the historical precedent invalidates the claim that the intended meaning of the word “citizens” only applied to white Americans. It could not be an <em>ad populum</em> fallacy since not all Americans agreed with such contention, and finally, it could not be a case of begging the claim since they do provide a finding that in their view supports their erroneous conclusion, so it is not circular logic.
<span>I do not know how to invest my money. Most animals thrive where they can find food easily.</span>
Whitney feels bad for the animals being hunted, whereas Rainsford does not have any sympathy towards the animals.
