There’s no image sorry....
Answer:
This excerpt from document two connects to when the abolition of slavery was truly beginning to happen. Buchanan was a democrat who morally was against slavery but seemed to think the Constitution protected the rights of slave owners. " Should it be refused, then the Constitution, to which all the States are parties, will have been willfully violated by one portion of them in a provision essential to the domestic security and happiness of the remainder" . Buchanan states simply that if the southeners are refused their " rights " to have slaves then the peace that Anti and Pro slavery people, will no longer exist. I am meeting the essay's requirements for contextualization because I am quoting the context directly and using the context to help inform my audience.
Explanation:
This is what I wrote. It may not be right but I'm sure it is. You may want to read over it and edit it so it sounds like you wrote it.
Answer: How should the law respond to people who engage in civil with the aim of bringing about a change in laws or government policies. Some theorists go further and say that civil disobedience is, ... Accepting punishment also can have great strategic value, as Martin Luther King Jr observes: 'If you confront ...
Definitions · Justification · Rights · Punishment
Explanation:
The U.S did not want the Europeans to interfere/colonize our land
Refers to the English term "Myth" or "Mythology"
