From PurdueOwl.com: “Circular Argument: This restates the argument rather than actually proving it. Example:
George Bush is a good communicator because he speaks effectively.
In this example, the conclusion that Bush is a "good communicator" and the evidence used to prove it "he speaks effectively" are basically the same idea. Specific evidence such as using everyday language, breaking down complex problems, or illustrating his points with humorous stories would be needed to prove either half of the sentence.”
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A poem isn't a person but is being treated as a person in the setence
I've seen this question before I would say B. if you have answers and if not It would be from the question there is the word bias so it means there is preference on something. Hope this helps! c:
Answer:
Is this the question?
Explanation:
"He's in every lover . . . beneath a window" is an allusion to Romeo that is recognizable even to readers who have not read Romeo and Juliet. What does the repetition of the words "in every" throughout the poem signal to readers? What message does Tempest convey through these words?
The actual classification is very difficult.
<span>Strong is very open ended. You can be physically strong, but morally corrupt. </span>
<span>Capable suggests a skill that is above adequate. You can be a warrior that is capable but he couldn't add two single digit numbers together. </span>
<span>Mighty has the same problem. </span>
<span>I would pick </span><span>capable, strong, and mighty </span>
