Answer:
Article VII, the final article of the Constitution, required that before the Constitution could become law and a new government could form, the document had to be ratified by nine of the thirteen states. Eleven days after the delegates at the Philadelphia convention approved it, copies of the Constitution were sent to each of the states, which were to hold ratifying conventions to either accept or reject it.
Explanation:
This approach to ratification was an unusual one. Since the authority inherent in the Articles of Confederation and the Confederation Congress had rested on the consent of the states, changes to the nation’s government should also have been ratified by the state legislatures. Instead, by calling upon state legislatures to hold ratification conventions to approve the Constitution, the framers avoided asking the legislators to approve a document that would require them to give up a degree of their own power. The men attending the ratification conventions would be delegates elected by their neighbors to represent their interests. They were not being asked to relinquish their power; in fact, they were being asked to place limits upon the power of their state legislators, whom they may not have elected in the first place.
1. the squirrel
2. He is in an economic crisis because he did not save money before the great depression
hope i helped!
In 1787, George Washington was persuaded to attend the Constitutional Convention and subsequently was unanimously elected its president.
Answer:
- The games were too closely related to an official school activity, showing religious support.
Explanation:
In Santa Fe District v. Doe, the court decided that understudy drove petition at a school football match-up fizzled the Lemon test since it was "excessively caught". This implies the court thought the amusements were excessively firmly identified with school action.
Along these lines, the football match couldn't be viewed as a private movement, yet open since it was empowered by the school. Additionally, the discourse radiating from this occasion would be open, and being straightforwardly energized by the school, would damage the Establishment Clause, by connecting legitimately to a substance of the government of the United States (the school) with religious issues.
I believe it’s the first one
