All gladiators in ancient Rome were Men, False
The emperor gave a thumbs up or down to decide the fate of the defeated gladiators, True
Romans feasted until they were full, then visited a room called a vomitorium to vomit the food out so they can start over again. True
Plebeians in Rome were the common or poorest people, True
Caesar's last words during his assassination were "Et tu, Brute", True
<h3>Who was Julius Caesar?</h3>
Julius Caesar was a Roman Stateman and General, served the Roman army and became the dictator, he ruled the Roman empire for 5 years from 49 BC to 44 BC till his assassination where his last words were "Et tu, Brute". All gladiators in ancient Rome were not Men, it is doubtful that some females were also gladiators. So the first statement is false while the rest are true.
Learn more about Julius Caesar at brainly.com/question/27177838
#SPJ1
Answer:
often surprised to learn that many of their beliefs about the causes of thoughts and behaviors are incorrect.
Explanation:
According to my research on different studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question they are often surprised to learn that many of their beliefs about the causes of thoughts and behaviors are incorrect. This is because people grow up learning different theories that change or are proven wrong over the years, yet once learned they stick with you until proven wrong.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Explanation:
Socialization is a lifelong process of learning, in which the norms, ideologies, and habits can be inherited, every individual have the skills and habits, related to the society, however, the individual life, is based on the socialization process, which can be divided into the primary and secondary socialization.
James thinks that julienne's poor marks are the result of insufficient studying. according to the law of "parsimony", the explanation that is more likely correct is "James's".
The law of parsimony is a critical thinking rule ascribed to William of Ockam who was a philosopher. It directs that a hypothesis ought to give the least complex or simplest conceivable (feasible) clarification for a phenomenon. Like in the given case the simplest explanation for not having good marks is that she did not study enough which is what James said.