1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
satela [25.4K]
3 years ago
8

Do you agree or disagree with the supreme court’s majority ruling in yarborough v.Alvarado? Write a short paragraph describing y

our answer and connect the case to the miranda v. Arizona decision.
Law
2 answers:
goblinko [34]3 years ago
6 0
Okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
olga_2 [115]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: I think that Michael Alvarado's conviction should have been overturned, not upheld by the Supreme Court. Even though he was not told he was under arrest or in custody, his belief that he was in custody was reasonable. This was especially true given his age. Therefore, he was entitled to his Miranda rights and should have been read his Miranda warning.

Explanation: This is the sample answer, hope it helps!

You might be interested in
What's my favorite song by Juice WRLD
saw5 [17]

Answer:

Wishing Well or Come and Go (i like come and go better btw)

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is the United state ready for a woman president?.
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

Honestly, due to the fact that women don't usually get voted for presidentacy and people don't think women can be presidents, no because they wouldn't let that happen.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Criminal trials and civil trials have different standards of proof. Why is that?
kumpel [21]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Crimes must generally be proved "beyond a reasonable doubt", whereas civil cases are proved by lower standards of proof such as "the preponderance of the evidence" (which essentially means that it was more likely than not that something occurred in a certain way).

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This is the decision in a civil case regarding what will be made up to the injured
denis-greek [22]
A "tort" is a wrongful act (sometimes called a "tortious" act), other than a breach of contract, that results in injury to someone's person, property, reputation, or the like, for which the injured person is entitled to compensation.
4 0
3 years ago
The attempted assassination of President Teddy Roosevelt caused so much public outrage that the insanity defense was greatly res
Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

The answer to this question is False.

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • There was a thunderstorm in your area and the power went out.
    9·2 answers
  • 32. Attempts by the federal government to prevent the exercise of monopoly power in the United States are called
    14·1 answer
  • Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts. True or False
    11·1 answer
  • If the police arrive at larry’s office without probable cause or a warrant and demand to search the premises, larry can
    14·1 answer
  • Who owns the rights to sell Cadbury in the US? Why is this a conflict now?
    10·2 answers
  • Thank you everyone for help me stay safe and healthy Bye
    5·2 answers
  • Name the ways in which a court order can compel specific performance as a remedy for breach of contract?
    7·1 answer
  • What are 3 reasons freedom of the press is important? *
    11·1 answer
  • Late one Saturday night, Eric breaks into a jewelry store. He fills a pillow case with silverware and jewelry. As he is preparin
    7·1 answer
  • In order to obtain court supervision for a traffic violation, a minor must appear in court with a parent/legal guardian and atte
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!