1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
satela [25.4K]
3 years ago
8

Do you agree or disagree with the supreme court’s majority ruling in yarborough v.Alvarado? Write a short paragraph describing y

our answer and connect the case to the miranda v. Arizona decision.
Law
2 answers:
goblinko [34]3 years ago
6 0
Okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
olga_2 [115]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: I think that Michael Alvarado's conviction should have been overturned, not upheld by the Supreme Court. Even though he was not told he was under arrest or in custody, his belief that he was in custody was reasonable. This was especially true given his age. Therefore, he was entitled to his Miranda rights and should have been read his Miranda warning.

Explanation: This is the sample answer, hope it helps!

You might be interested in
What is article 12 in the UAE law book?
Snezhnost [94]
Idk the answer sorry
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is called
xeze [42]

Answer:

The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states is false.

Explanation:

Contributory negligence is a doctrine of common law that if a person was injured in part due to his/her own negligence, that is his/her negligence contributed to the accident, the injured party would not be entitled to collect any damages (money) from another party who supposedly caused the accident.

And historically, contributory negligence was the rule in all states, leading to harsh results. Many states now developed and adopted comparative negligence laws. Today, the jurisdictions that still use contributory negligence are few.

5 0
3 years ago
What kind of animal did Cleopatra use to kill herself?
inna [77]

Answer:a snake

Explanation:

she had the snake bit her on the body

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When you are driving a motor home and are following another vehicle, you
Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

B. Use two times the following distance that

you use when driving your car.

5 0
3 years ago
Describe one democratic principle exemplified in the United States Constitution. Be specific about where in the constitution thi
REY [17]

Answer:

Religious freedom is a democratic principle that is well exemplified in the American Constitution, being exhibited in the first constitutional amendment.

Explanation:

One of the main principles seen in democracy is the defense of popular freedom. An example of this can be seen in the first American constitutional amendment, which states that Congress and no governmental sphere can determine a religion to be followed, how to prevent worship and the celebration of any activity of any religion. This gives citizens the power of choice, which is strongly advocated within democratic concepts.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Define and describe gender based violence ​
    13·2 answers
  • As an attorney for Dudley and Stephens, what arguements would you make on their behalf? As an attorney for the government, what
    15·1 answer
  • Why do we need government paragraph
    12·1 answer
  • The job of a jury foreperson could be compared to that of a
    12·2 answers
  • What does the Bill of Rights do?
    12·1 answer
  • Who can obtain a search warrant for a crime scene?
    10·1 answer
  • An important duty of the president is
    11·2 answers
  • HELP ME PLSSSSSS ITS FOR A TEST PLSSS HELP
    13·2 answers
  • Please help with this question
    15·2 answers
  • The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution tells the purpose of the government. Which words or phrases in the Preamble do you believe
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!