1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natali 33 [55]
3 years ago
9

Why did John Adams agree to defend Captain Preston and the British soldiers?

History
2 answers:
Irina18 [472]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Did the soldiers fire into the crowd because they wanted to harm citizens? ...  Yes, they did.

Did Captain Preston give the order to fire? ...  No, the soldiers mistakenly heard the order.

Did John Adams make a strong case? ...  No, the witnesses showed that Preston ordered the firing.

Did the majority of the fault lie with the British soldiers? ...  Yes, it did.

Hope This Helps!!!

Jlenok [28]3 years ago
6 0
He thinks the British soldiers who are involved deserved a fair trial and that the rule of law should be paramount.
You might be interested in
How did he response of president ronald reagan to the aids crisis compare to the response of president goerge h. w. bush?
Darya [45]
<span>President Reagan responded slowly to the crisis while research funding increased under president bush.
hope it helps

</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the efforts of an American who worked for civil rights or equal rights during the 1960s or 1970s. Explain the effects t
Aneli [31]
They went on many protests throughout that time frame, and it caused a movement where so many people fought got the same thing so it was widely recognized throughout America and even widely recognized today.
8 0
3 years ago
A justification for the American Revolution can be found in which of the following historical documents?
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

Declaration of Independence

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What event is typically used to mark the begginig of the early middle ages
lana66690 [7]
THE renaissance era!!!
6 0
3 years ago
“If a nation is attacked the only recourse is to attack back” Agree or disagree and why?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Not really,

It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
 some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Where was william wallace from in scotland?
    9·1 answer
  • Who decided that organized resistance by southern states who prevent racial integration in the south
    9·1 answer
  • How would you summarize the Battle of Bunker Hill into one sentence?​
    5·2 answers
  • What is the aircraft of the day
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these locations contains some of the earliest ribbed vaults? A. St. Etienne b. Cathedral of st. James c. San clement d.
    9·2 answers
  • [APEX] Please Help {ASAP} -- How did colonization affect Africa?
    14·1 answer
  • The national union of women's suffrage societies (NUWSS) and the women's social and political Union (WSPU) most differed in whic
    13·2 answers
  • The Battle of Antietam, September 17, 1862, is considered pivotal to the outcome of the Civil War because it:________.
    9·2 answers
  • Wich of the following was a provision fugitive slave act
    10·1 answer
  • This is for history and is about the end of reconstruction
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!