It means to make the audience want to talk and be apart of whetever social change you choose to write about, it makes people want to change and be apart of your movement.
It would affect how they communicate as a community and could effect how independent or dependent a colony would be. Like if you would go fishing for ur food, or if you would buy your food instead.
C.) Both inform the reader that Faryad and Liaqat were not given the chance to tell their version of events at the police station.
In the frames, both Faryad and Liaqat put their fingerprint on a piece of paper when they are at the police station. However, neither of them are given a chance to tell their story. In Faryad's case, "the police write down what they claim has happened". The testimony in the report is not Faryad's. In Liaqat's case, after he put his fingerprint on the paper, he was told to leave and not given any interview.
Option D is incorrect because the reader is not the one responsible for investigating what Faryad and Liaqat were prevented from saying. It does make the reader curious and interested, but the reader can't do the investigation. Option B is wrong because there is no miscommunication. Option A is wrong because there is no proof or even mention of a death in either the frames or the excerpt.
I would say that the best correct answer sounds like
C.) <span>He returns, admits his mistake, and apologizes.
</span>i really hope i helped you out in some type of way :)))
A leader are brave humans that is capable to take the decisions and ensure execution. The leader also has the responsibility to the decisions it makes and even though it resulted failure, the leader accepts its faith. A leader is also someone who motivates its followers to make a difference.
A follower is someone who is attracted to the purpose of the leader's goal or objective and in turn helps the leader achieve his or hers goal. Followers are also the ones who inspires the leader to lead the objective.
