The British take over of Egypt was an example of "imperialism", since it meant that the British went into a foreign country and imposed their economic and political will.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there is no specific context, topic, or references, we can say the following.
My recommendations on how one person can exercise freedom more responsibility are the following.
The best way to make people do the right thing every time is to let them understand that everything they do has a consequence. They are free, of course. They are free to decide. But for every decision, there is a consequence and they have to accept the consequences for their decisions and actions. People have to understand that, as they are free, other people are free and they do not like anyone to mess with their freedom because that is when trouble starts.
Answer:
c it was about colonists not wanting to be taxed without a say/representation
The correct answer to this question is C) proprietary colonies.
The English colonies of New York and New Jersey were originally proprietary colonies. Later these colonies became royal colonies.
In the 17th century, proprietary colonies directly belonged to the British Crown. The King of England gave some of these states to friends and family to rule, always under the direction of the crown of England. That being the case, the King gave New Netherlands to the Duke of York, his younger brother, and renamed New York. New Jersey was a proprietary colony after 1664 and became a royal colony in 1702.
Answer:
explanation
Explanation:
Just like men and women supported votes for women, men and women organized against suffrage as well. Anti-suffragists argued that most women did not want the vote. Because they took care of the home and children, they said women did not have time to vote or stay updated on politics.
Instead of promoting a vision of gender equality, suffragists usually argued that the vote would enable women to be better wives and mothers. Women voters, they said, would bring their moral superiority and domestic expertise to issues of public concern.
