the answer is B It compensated them with latifundia taken from the previous government.
The synthetic parallelism that is used here is the completion of the attributes of God in the second part of the verse.
<h3>What is synthetic parallelism?</h3>
This is a situation where the first idea that was contained in the first part of a text is completed in its second part.
In the first part of this psalm, God is referred to as a great God. Stll continuing on the idea that he is great, the second part says he is a great king over all other gods.
Read more on psalms here: brainly.com/question/2998438
the correct option is B Tourism and agriculture
The pacific islands refers to a group of islands in the pacific. the biggest of these islands is Papua Guinea. Others include Tahiti, which belongs to a group of island administered by French. some islands like Fiji, and solomon islands though are independent.
The main economic activity in these islands is agriculture. The islands enjoy a pleasant climate. Papua guinea for example is one of the largest producer of cocoa. Tourism as an economic activity has also been on the rise as the islands have very beautiful beaches.
Answer:
The end of Rasputin’s influence.
Explanation:
please mark brainliest!
Answer: Appeasement in an international context is a diplomatic policy of making political or material concessions to an aggressive power in order to avoid conflict.[1] The term is most often applied to the foreign policy of the UK governments of Prime Ministers Ramsay MacDonald (in office: 1929–1935), Stanley Baldwin (in office: 1935–1937), and (most notably) Neville Chamberlain (in office: 1937–1940) towards Nazi Germany (from 1933) and Fascist Italy (established in 1922)[2] between 1935 and 1939. Appeasement of Nazism and Fascism also played a role in French foreign policy of the period.[3]
At the beginning of the 1930s, appeasing concessions were widely seen as desirable - due to the anti-war reaction to the trauma of World War I (1914–1918), second thoughts about the vindictive treatment of Germany in the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, and a perception that fascism was a useful form of anti-communism. However, by the time of the Munich Pact—concluded on 30 September 1938 between Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy—the policy was opposed by the Labour Party, by a few Conservative dissenters such as future Prime Minister Winston Churchill, Secretary of State for War Duff Cooper, and future Prime Minister Anthony Eden. Appeasement was strongly supported by the British upper class, including royalty, big business (based in the City of London), the House of Lords, and media such as the BBC and The Times.[4]
As alarm grew about the rise of fascism in Europe, Chamberlain resorted to news censorship to control public opinion.[5] He confidently announced after Munich that he had secured "peace for our time".[6]
Academics, politicians, and diplomats have intensely debated the 1930s appeasement policies for more than seventy years. The historians' assessments have ranged from condemnation for allowing Hitler's Germany to grow too strong, to the judgment that Germany was so strong that it might well win a war and that postponement of a showdown was in their country's best interests. Historian Andrew Roberts argued in 2019: "Indeed, it is the generally accepted view in Britain today that they were right at least to have tried... Britain would not enter hostilities for many more months, admitting unreadiness to directly oppose Germany in combat. She sat and watched the invasion of France, acting only four years later."[7] (Compare the British role in the Battle of France in 1940.)
Explanation: