Producers
<span>hope this helps!!!</span>
Answer:
Use rerospective valuation and then begin to use Fair value valuation of the investment account from 2019 and beyond
Explanation:
First, it should be noted that Jordan will make use of different methods to account for change in its account.
A first method will apply to a retrospective adjustment method to make relevant changes in the investment account
The second step is to now use the fair-value method for his account from 2019 and beyond.
The idea of using a retrospective method is to engage or apply a new accounting pricnciple as though it has always been applied, using the retrospective method will assist Jordan to compare teh year 2018 where it had significant influence over the opeations of Nico to 2019 and future years when it begins to use the fair-value method of investment valuation.
Answer:
42.5%
Explanation:
The computation of the inflation rate between 2012 and 2011 is shown below:
But before that we need to do the following calculations
Cost of basket for the year 2011 is
= 5 × 2 + 20 × 0.5
= 10 + 10
= 20
And the base year price index i.e. CPI is 100
Now
Cost of same basket in year 2012 is
= 5 × 2.10 + 20 × 0.90
= 10.5 + 18
= 28.5
Now
CPI in 2012 is
= ($28.5 ÷ $20) × 100
= 142.5
So,
Inflation rate is
= (142.5 ÷ 100) - 1
= 1.425 - 1
= 0.425
= 42.5%
<em>The complete question reads;</em>
When you want to save time recording progress and don't mind slightly less accuracy, which progress reporting approach would you choose?
a. tracking work and remaining work at the task level
b. tracking % complete at the task level
c. tracking work at the assignment level
d. tracking % complete at the assignment level
Answer:
<u>d. tracking % complete at the assignment level</u>
Explanation:
Remember, tracking the percent of completion of the assignment level would be indicating an overview of the entire assignment which may be slightly less accurate compared to the other listed options.
Thus, to save time recording progress this is the best viable option.
