Answer:
Restrictions on the amounts individuals may contribute to political Campaigns
Explanation:
The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA)
-limited amounts of campaign contributions by individuals & organizations
-created public funding for presidential elections (voluntary $3 check off on income tax returns)
-requires disclosure of contributions
dirty money
<em>Hope this helps!!!</em>
Answer:
Legislation that addressed the goals of the movement did not always result in real equality.
The questions states that economic inequality between the genders has been a problem at least since 1961. Feminists addressed this issue, and they attempted to pass legislation in order to fix this divide. In 1963, the legislation was created. Nevertheless, women continue to earn less than men nowadays. This means that although the legislation addressed the issue, it did not result in real equality. It implies other actions might be needed in order to correct this inequality.
I think I am not sure though
Ronald Reagan was elected president in 1981.
<span>A member of Congress who serves as a communications channel between the house's leadership and the rank-and-file members is known as The Speaker of the House. The current speaker of the House is John Boehner.</span>
Answer:
<h2>The rights of the people </h2><h3>(of each individual person)</h3>
Explanation:
John Locke was one of the first of the Enlightenment era philosophers. The Enlightenment's emphasis on reason was in contrast to superstition and traditional beliefs. The Scientific Revolution had shown that there are natural laws in place in the physical world and in the universe at large. Applying similar principles to matters like government and society, using reason will guide us to the best ways to operate politically so as to create the most beneficial conditions for society. This included a conviction that all human beings have certain natural rights which are to be protected and preserved. Locke's ideal was one that promoted individual freedom and equal rights and opportunity for all. Each individual's well-being (life, health, liberty, possessions) should be served by the way government and society are arranged.
