D: the definition of analogy is “a correspondence or partial similarity”.
Answer:
Here
Explanation:
Say to the teacher that "I'm to old to read this multiple choice" and say "
.sS$$$$$$$$$$$$$$Ss.
.$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$s.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$s.
S$$$$' `$$$$$$$$$$$$$
`$$' `$$$$$$$$$$$.
: `$$$$$$$$$$$
: `$$$$$$$$$$
.====. ,=====. $$$$$$$$$$
.' ~' ". s$$$$$$$$$$
: : :=_ $$$$$$$$$$$
`. () : () ' ~=$$$$$$$$$$$'
~====~`. .' $$$$$$$$$$$
.' ~====~ sS$$$$$$$$$'
: . $$$$$' $$$$
.sS$$$$$$$$Ss. `$$' $$$'
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$s s$$$$
$SSSSSSSSSSSSSSS$ $$$$$
: $$$$'
`. $$$'
`. :
: :
: .'`.
.'. .' :
: .$s. .' .'
:.S$$$S. .' .'
: $$$$$$`.' .'
$$$$ `. .'
C.) Would be the logo! The others seem to be for a school column or someone explaining that they need healthier choices while C seems to be promoting their brand!
Good luck, rockstar! I hope you pass. (:
The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
