Answer:
the Europeans got the better deal from the Colombian Exchange
Step-by-step explanation:
In general, one would have to say that the Europeans got the better deal from the Columbian Exchange in that it facilitated the eventual establishment of colonies in the New World. That's not to say that it was all one-way traffic; however, the people of the New World undoubtedly benefitted in both the short and long-term by the introduction of crops and livestock. But such benefits proved to be more keenly felt by subsequent waves of European settlers than America's indigenous population.
After all, it wasn't much good for Native-Americans to have all these crops and all this livestock if, in due course, there'd be less land available for their use due to increased colonization. The indigenous peoples also suffered terribly from the introduction of diseases such as measles and smallpox, for which they had no natural immunity. It's difficult, then, to avoid the conclusion that the Europeans got the better deal from the Columbian Exchange (as it was probably intended that they should).
simply -
The Natives did benefit, but only for a short while, and the Europeans benefited the most
Kono Dio Da!!!
B
If you need help to visualize it, think of 48 circles. Circle groups of 6 circles. Grouping the circles, is the same as plain dividing 48 by 6 without the pictures.
Using a marxist perspective how would you look the issue of contractualization of workers in the philippines using a marxist perspective how would you look the issue of contractualization of workers in the philippines using a marxist perspective how would you look the issue of contractualization of workers in the philippines
Answer:
Troll 1: Knight
Troll 2: Knave
Troll 3: Knight
Step-by-step explanation:
Troll 3's statement must be true because if they can only be knights or knaves, unless all of them are knaves, at least one must be a knight. Thus, Troll 3 is a knight.
If Troll 2 is a knight, then Troll 1 is knave, but if that were the case Troll 1's statement would be true, and since knaves do not tell the truth, this assumption is incorrect.
If Troll 2 is a knave, Troll 1 is a knight and his statement can be disregarded since it is conditioned to the possibility of him being a knave.
Therefore, Trolls 1 and 3 are knights and Troll 2 is a knave.
