<span>The eighteenth century was marked by anti-colonial rebellions that sought to curb reforms that affected local interests. The participation of the indigenous sectors, which faced the colonial power, would include Ruben Um Nyobé, leader of the Union of the People of Cameroon (UPC), assassinated by the French army. Barthélemy Boganda, leader of the nationalist movement Central African Republic. Patrice Lumumba, the first Prime Minister of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, among others from different parts.</span>
The options for this question aren't correct and are probably of another question.
Thus let's see the general features of the Gilded Age:
The Gilded Age is the period between the end of the Civil War and the beginning of the 20th century. Its name was given by a book by Mark Twain called <em>The Gilded Age: A tale of today</em>.
This period is characterized by the growth of monopolies in the economy that led to many corruption scandals where politicians plotted with industrialists and businessmen. An expression famous at the time was robber barons.
It was also an age of great industrialization of the country that led to many changes in the social structure of the society. More fabrics meant a growth in the working class that was violently explored by the bourgeoisie. That's why in this period there was also an increase in labor movements. Violent exploration of the working class led to a moment of economic growth and production of wealth that wasn't equally distributed.
In this period the US received thousands of immigrants that created a large population of poor people in the cities living in tenements. This was famously shown in the book <em>How the other half lives</em> by Jacob Riis, himself a Danish migrant.
It was also a time of railroad expansion with the construction of the Transcontinental Railroad and the muckracking journalism where reporters would focus their work on exposing corruption between politicans and the economic elite.
I hope this is right but I think one thing was his life and the legacy he bring to people
El Greco was disdained by the immediate generations after his death because his work was opposed in many respects to the principles of the early baroque style which came to the fore near the beginning of the 17th century and soon supplanted the last surviving traits of the 16th-century Mannerism.[1] The painter was deemed incomprehensible and had no important followers[4] Only his son and a few unknown painters produced weak copies of El Greco's works. Later 17th- and early 18th-century Spanish commentators praised his skill but criticized his anti-naturalistic style and his complex iconography. Some of these commentators, such as Antonio Palomino and Céan Bermúdez described his mature work as "contemptible", "ridiculous" and "worthy of scorn".[5] The views of Palomino and Bermúdez were frequently repeated in Spanish historiography, adorned with terms such as "strange", "queer", "original", "eccentric" and "odd".[6] The phrase "sunk in eccentricity", often encountered in such texts, in time became his "madness".
Hope this helps!!!
Answer:
Works Progress Administration (WPA)
Explanation:
