Target posted final quarter income of $21.5 billion. This brought income of about 81 pennies for every share. But the examiner <span>agreement was calling for income of 80 pennies for each share</span>. So, with 81 pennies for every share the examiner agreement was beated.
Yo Mf leave this page right now nobody cares abot your questions
Answer:
The CPA rebuts the allegations
Explanation:
The Securities Act of 1933 requires that investors receive financial and other significant information regarding any and all securities being sold publicly and prohibits deceit, misrepresentations, and other fraud in the sale of securities. Therefore, since there was material misstatement or omission in the financial statements, the only chance the CPA has is if they rebut the allegations. Meaning that they provide actual evidence, such as physical statements or witnesses that contradict or nullify the evidence that is being presented against them regarding the material misstatement or omission
Answer:
The answer is D, hope this helped!
Explanation:
The answer is D because its a realistic thing to have bills and sometimes you have to take risks or youll have nothing. <3
Answer:
Cash flow year 0 (110,000)
or in other way to express it: a cashoutflow for $110,000
Explanation:
Initial net cahs outflow
this will be the acquisition of the machine cost plus the increase in the working capital for the company
machine cost: all cost necessary for acquire the machien and get it operational
supplier list price 85,000
installation cost <u> 15,000</u>
total cost 100,000
Increase in Working Capital Cost 10,000
As these are cost they are negative so we have a cashouflow
Total cashflow (110,000)