1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masya89 [10]
4 years ago
8

Why would absolute monarchs claim divine right to rule

History
2 answers:
Gekata [30.6K]4 years ago
6 0

The concept of the ruling by divine mandate has been a part of several religions, and this concept has provided ruling power to several kingdoms. In ancient times, religion and superstition governed people rather than logic and reason.  

Further Explanation:

The belief in the divine and supernatural was an abstract feeling, that common person could not or were not supposed to comprehend. The monarch claimed the divine right to rule because it immediately elevated his status in comparison with his ruled subjects, thus proving that only he could be chosen by the Divine powers to rule his subjects on their behalf. Thus, the king was only considered a medium through which God, the Universal Ruler, ruled his subjects. The appointment of the king by God meant that only God could remove the monarch on account of misusing power bestowed on them.  

The divine mandate to rule was deemed to be absolute. The right to rule could not be bestowed on anyone commoner but was restricted only within the ruling family. Thus, the right to rule by divine right was passed on from generation to generation. Therefore, the monarch’s authority will remain unchallenged, as he derives his ruling power directly from God, thereby ensuring his position. Often kings are also depicted as incarnations of the divine power, that supported the theory that God has taken the metaphysical form of the monarch and descended upon Earth to rule his subjects and restore law and order. Monarchs would often claim their right to legitimacy by tracing their heritage from divine dynasties. The divine right to rule was one of the main reasons due to which regicide was considered as a sin.  

Learn more:

1. Starting in the 1800s, members of the suffragist movement in the united states focused on women's right to

<u>brainly.com/question/1298741 </u>

2. How many of the devices you identified inside the control room need electricity to operate?

<u>brainly.com/question/730146 </u>

Answer Details:

Grade: Graduation

Chapter: The divine right to rule.

Subject: History

Keywords:

Divine right, monarchy, hereditary rights, incarnations of the divine, God’s rule on Earth. Legitimacy, regicide.

Anettt [7]4 years ago
5 0

The absolutist monarchs claimed divine right to rule because, by basing their power on a divine mandate, the people could not contradict them or face them, since as being a divine disposition it was something unquestionable.

The divine right of kings meant that the authority of a king to rule came from the will of the deity of the people he governs, and not from any temporal authority, not even from the will of his subjects or from any testament. Chosen by his deity, a monarch was only responsible before him, and he had only to answer for his actions before God. The doctrine implied that the deposition of the king or the restriction of power and prerogatives of the crown were acts contrary to the will of God.

You might be interested in
QUESTION 2
andrew-mc [135]
C.

Article One of the United States Constitution establishes the legislative branch of the federal government, the United States Congress. ... Article One's Vesting Clause grants all federal legislative power to Congress and establishes that Congress consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate. - Wikipedia
4 0
3 years ago
Arthur is on trial for manslaughter. However, he doesn’t have the resources to hire a competent lawyer. In this case, which amen
Anestetic [448]
The Sixth Amendment, which gives the right to counsel or attorney
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
As a senator what would you have done differently in the Missouri compromise?
valentinak56 [21]

Explanation:

The Senate passes the Missouri Compromise, an attempt to deal with the dangerously divisive issue of extending slavery into the western territories. From colonial days to the Civil War, slavery and western expansion both played fundamental but inherently incompatible roles in the American republic

3 0
3 years ago
Before 1870 what was the main source of food for the Indians?
AlekseyPX

Answer:

Although people of the Plains hunted other animals, such as elk or antelope, buffalo was the primary game food source.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why wasnt there a great need or desire for book in the middle agaes
baherus [9]
Because no one had the time to read a book they didn't know how to read all they were focused on was working to support their families and sleeping since they were tired
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are concurrent powers
    12·2 answers
  • Why did a new class of wealthy romans emerge after The conquests
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the fur trade of North America expand so quickly from the late sixteenth into the seventeenth century?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the desire to expand into new markets help push the United States to extend its influence into the pacific
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the nations new capital build on the Potomac River between Maryland and Virginia
    8·1 answer
  • Which territory was added to the Roman Republic following its conflict with the Seleucid Empire?
    7·2 answers
  • In Fidel Castro's quote, who does he feel has been terribly wronged in Cuba? In other words,
    10·1 answer
  • How was sunday revered in puritan culture?
    13·1 answer
  • *GIVING OUT 20 POINTS. PLEASE HELP ASAP!*
    12·2 answers
  • In ancient Egypt the main duty of the vizier was to
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!