1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oduvanchick [21]
3 years ago
10

Why did the Renaissance begin in northern Italy?

History
2 answers:
Andrei [34K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: The Renaissance was a rebirth of ancient Greek and Roman thinking and styles, and both the Roman and Greek civilizations were Mediterranean cultures, as is Italy. The best single reason for Italy as the birthplace of the Renaissance was the concentration of wealth, power, and intellect in the Church.

Explain:

One major reason the Renaissance began in Italy is linked to geography. The city-states of Italy,

positioned on the Mediterranean Sea, were centers for trade and commerce, the first port of call for

both goods and new ideas.

Secondly, Italy was the core of the former Roman empire, and, at the collapse of the Byzantine empire

in 1453, became the refuge for the intellectuals of Constantinople who brought with them many of the

great works of the ancient Greeks and Romans, works that had been lost to the West during the Dark

Ages. Prior to this, scholars in Italy had been examining the works of the ancients, but they were of poor

quality and often incomplete.

The third reason was political. Due to various political intrigues, the Holy Roman Empire had essentially

lost power in northern Italy, the papal states were governed by various leading families within each

region, and the city of Naples dominated the South. This vacuum of leadership allowed merchant

families to gain considerate power within each city-state and thus revised the laws governing banking,

commerce, shipping, and trade. This freer atmosphere led to a busy exchange of both goods and ideas.

Andreas93 [3]3 years ago
4 0

It was because the churches in northern Italy had the art for the Renaissance and because Italy was wealthy and had already been the center of Ancient Greek and Roman culture.  

You might be interested in
How might new innovations have enabled European countries to dominate other countries or regions
Lady_Fox [76]

Answer:

The Industrial Revolution in Great Britain in the middle of the 18th century marked the beginning of a technological gap that would define the political landscape of the world in favor of the European nations. This period supposed the creation of many devices that improved not only these regions economical activities but also the military, as European navies were able to settle in many parts throughout the world with relative ease. Improvements in weaponry gave Europeans the edge when it came to conflicts with locals in different parts of the world.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
what geographical features of the Fertile cresent helped civilization to grow and ideas to spread between cultures?​
Nikolay [14]

Explanation:

Known as the Cradle of Civilization, the Fertile Crescent is regarded as the birthplace of agriculture, urbanization, writing, trade, science, history and organized religion and was first populated c. 10,000 BCE when agriculture and the domestication of animals began in the region. By 9,000 BCE the cultivation of wild grains and cereals was wide-spread and, by 5000 BCE, irrigation of agricultural crops was fully developed. By 4500 BCE the cultivation of wool-bearing sheep was practiced widely.

The geography and climate of the region were conducive to agriculture and hunter-gatherer societies shifted to sedentary communities in the area as they were able to support themselves from the land. The climate was semi-arid but the humidity, and proximity of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers (and, further south, the Nile), encouraged the cultivation of crops. Rural communities developed along with technological advances in agriculture and, once these were established, domestication of animals followed.  

4 0
3 years ago
Compare the results of the boston police strike and the steel strike?
Luden [163]

In the Boston Police Strike, Boston police officers went on strike on September 9, 1919. They sought recognition for their trade union and improvements in wages and working conditions. Police Commissioner Edwin Upton Curtis denied that police officers had any right to form a union, much less one affiliated with a larger organization like the American Federation of Labor (AFL). Attempts at reconciliation between the Commissioner and the police officers, particularly on the part of Boston's Mayor Andrew James Peters, failed.

During the strike, Boston experienced several nights of lawlessness. Several thousand members of the State Guard, supported by volunteers, restored order. Press reaction both locally and nationally described the strike as Bolshevik-inspired and directed at the destruction of civil society. The strikers were called "deserters" and "agents of Lenin."[1]

Samuel Gompers of the AFL recognized that the strike was damaging the cause of labor in the public mind and advised the strikers to return to work. Commissioner Curtis refused to re-hire the striking policemen. He was supported by Massachusetts Governor Calvin Coolidge, whose rebuke of Gompers earned him a national reputation. The strike proved a setback for labor unions, and the AFL discontinued its attempts to organize police officers for another two decades. Coolidge won the Republican nomination for vice-president of the U.S. in the 1920 presidential election.n 1895, the Massachusetts legislature transferred control of the Boston police department from Boston's mayor to the governor of Massachusetts, whom it authorized to appoint a five-person board of commissioners to manage the department. In 1906, the legislature abolished that board and gave the governor the authority to name a single commissioner to a term of five years, subject to removal by the governor. The mayor and the city continued to have responsibility for the department's expenses and the physical working conditions of its employees, but the commissioner controlled department operations and the hiring, training, and discipline of the police officers.[2]

In 1918, the salary for patrolmen was set at $1,400 a year. Police officers had to buy their own uniforms and equipment which cost over $200. New recruits received $730 during their first year, which increased annually to $821.25 and $1000, and to $1,400 after six years.[3] In the years following World War I, inflation dramatically eroded the value of a police officer's salary. From 1913 to May 1919, the cost of living rose by 76%, while police wages rose just 18%.[2] Discontent and restiveness among the Boston police force grew as they compared their wages and found they were earning less than an unskilled steelworker, half as much as a carpenter or mechanic and 50 cents a day less than a streetcar conductor. Boston city laborers were earning a third more on an hourly basis.[3]

Police officers had an extensive list of grievances. They worked ten-hour shifts and typically recorded weekly totals between 75 and 90 hours.[a] They were not paid for time spent on court appearances.[2] They also objected to being required to perform such tasks as "delivering unpaid tax bills, surveying rooming houses, taking the census, or watching the polls at election" and checking the backgrounds of prospective jurors as well as serving as "errand boys" for their officers.[5] They complained about having to share beds and the lack of sanitation, baths, and toilets[2] at many of the 19 station houses where they were required to live, most of which dated to before the Civil War. The Court Street station had four toilets for 135 men, and one bathtub.


4 0
4 years ago
What was the role of the united states as envisioned by the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine?
mars1129 [50]

The correct answer is:

Law enforcer of the Western Hemisphere was the role of the United States as envisioned by the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine.  

The Roosevelt Corollary, consistent with his Big Stick Diplomacy, was written in 1904 after the Venezuela Crisis of 1902–03, as an addition to the Monroe Doctrine.

It stated that the US would intervene in conflicts between European and Latin American countries to enforce legitimate European claims, instead of having them pressing their claims directly.  


5 0
4 years ago
Read this quote from the political platform of the
vovangra [49]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which power is shared by the Senate and the house of representatives?
    9·2 answers
  • A student makes a list of resources that have minimal effect on the environment with respect to their use. Which resources shoul
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with these, please?
    9·1 answer
  • Who are the Aramaeans
    13·1 answer
  • How did the athenians get the goods they needed for every day use
    8·2 answers
  • How did the 13th,14th,15th,19th,and 26 amendment impact minority participation in the political process?
    12·1 answer
  • X(x-3)+2 x =1 can someone pls answer fast<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • Annapurna I rock type?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following sentences from the passage BEST supports the idea that the citizens of Pompeii were unaware that the volc
    14·2 answers
  • What does the constitutional guarantee of freedom of the press mean for news people? They can write about unsupported rumors as
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!