The laws from many years ago I think
The American attitude shifted in favor of rights for Native Americans. This is based on "Polls showed that Americans believed in rights for Native Americans". Why it's not A is because it wasn't the polling that contributed to the act, but what the polls showed which is C.
C. preemption is the answer to your question.
I hope I helped.
<span> He or she must prove that the slanderous statement was made with actual malice.
</span>
The supreme court case is called <span>New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. in the ruling it was held that actual malice must established in defining slanderous statement for compensation purposes.
</span>
