Hello!
Number one:
C. Locke: Two Treatises of Government
Number two:
Magna Carta.
Number three:
D. Articles of Confederation.
Preventing genocide is one of the greatest challenges facing the international community.[1]<span> Aside from the suffering and grief inflicted upon generations of people and the catastrophic social, economic and political dislocations that follow, this ‘crime of crimes’ has the potential to destabilize entire regions for decades (Bosco, 2005). The shockwaves of Rwanda’s genocide are still felt in the eastern parts of the Democratic Republic of Congo nearly 20 years later, for example. Considerable resources are now devoted to the task of preventing genocide. In 2004 the United Nations established the Office of the Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide with the purpose to ‘raise awareness of the causes and dynamics of genocide, to alert relevant actors where there is a risk of genocide, and to advocate and mobilize for appropriate action’ (UN 2012). At the 2005 World Summit governments pledged that where states were ‘manifestly failing’ to protect their populations from ‘war crimes, genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity’ the international community could step in a protect those populations itself (UN, 2012). The ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) project, designed to move the concept of state sovereignty away from an absolute right of non-intervention to a moral charge of shielding the welfare of domestic populations, is now embedded in international law (Evans 2008). Just this year, the United States government has stated that ‘preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States,’ and that ‘President Obama has made the prevention of atrocities a key focus of this Administration’s foreign policy’ (Auschwitz Institute, 2012). Numerous scholars and non-government organisations have similarly made preventing genocide their primary focus (Albright and Cohen, 2008; Genocide Watch, 2012).</span>
AFDC was terminated in 1996.
<h3>What is AFDC?</h3>
The Social Security Act (SSA), which established the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) federal aid program, which was run by the US Department of Health and Human Services from 1935 to 1997, gave money to children whose families had little or no income.
The program expanded from being a small component of social security to becoming a substantial welfare system run by the states with federal financing. It was criticized, meanwhile, for providing disincentives for women to enter the workforce and incentives for women to have children. The more stringent Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program took over from AFDC in July 1997.
To learn more about AFDC, visit:
<u>brainly.com/question/9813056</u>
#SPJ4
Do you have any options or is this a fill in the blank?
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
The government doesn't give insurance to anything.
Only insurance company's do that.
