It’s D!
I really do hope this helps, and the answer is right!
<span>1876 Supreme Court case ruled against any individual right to bear armsSecond Amendment guaranteed only states' rights to maintain militiasState governments could regulate guns however they saw fit<span>Presser v. Illinois affirmed Cruikshank ruling, further clarified that Second Amendment rights had not been "incorporated"—that is, they were not binding on the states</span></span>
Until quite recently, the answer to that question was pretty simple—the Court's interpretation of the Second Amendment was established in just a few cases. The first of these was United States v. Cruikshank. You can read more about this case here, but the short version is that in 1876 the Court ruled that the Second Amendment served only to protect the states against the federal government. Because the states in 1787 were worried that a too-powerful federal government might trample their rights, the Court said, the Second Amendment was added to the Constitution guaranteeing their right to maintain militias. The Second Amendment did not, in this interpretation, provide any individual right to keep and bear arms; it only guaranteed a state's right to maintain a militia. Moreover, since these militias were to be "well regulated," and since the Second Amendment was aimed only at the threat posed by the federal government, state governments were—according to this ruling—free to regulate guns in any manner they saw fit.
Governor of Giorgia has many formal responsibilities stated by the Constitution, among those powers we can mention:
1- The command of military forces in Giorgia, since he is the commarnder-in chief.
2- In case of any vacancy in the Georgia House of Representatives and Georgia senate, he/she is the person allowed to fill it.
3- Governor is in charge of assuring the execution of laws and of maintaining the peace and order among citizens.
Answer <em>The Spanish gained an early foothold in the colonies, quickly becoming the most powerful. Spanish colonization after Columbus accelerated the rivalry between Spain and Illness played a much greater role in the city's downfall than violence. Regardless, without Malintzin's help, Cortés would not have been able to Spain gained goods from America such as gold and silver, and they also used Native Americans to farm for them. How did Spain benefit from the conquest and colonization of the Americas? The encomienda system was a system of forced labor. When the encomienda system was ended, the slavery of Indians was also prohibited. Hope That Helps!</em>
<em>-Itsbrazts</em>
One of the hard things about hunting down Osama was he was in a different country. When you are a wanted criminal or terrorist and you go to another country there’s a lot of legal stuff that goes on for trying to bring them back. One of those struggles is the country’s decision to actually hand over the criminal. They may have happened but in that concern I’m not quite sure of. There’s also the fact that he was probably hiding for those ten years but hey ended up finding Osama with a satellite. Hope this helps!
