1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
asambeis [7]
3 years ago
11

Juries should not watch the news while serving. Why?

Law
1 answer:
n200080 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

they need an unbiased opinion.

Explanation:

a jury is supposed to have a clean slate about a case when they go into the trial, watching the news while serving could give them biases against or for the defendant. news channels are also very biased and could change the jury’s idea in their mind that they got from court.

You might be interested in
Hello :) remember, God keeps His promises! An example is the rainbow.. It shows the promise of God that He will never flood the
ohaa [14]

Answer:

Ty for the prayer/notice. God bless you!

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Now write a CV with Cover Letter to the Head of the Department of Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation for the post adv
Darina [25.2K]

To, The Head of Finance

Dear Sir,

I have recently seen your advertisement regarding the vacant post in the finance department of your organization. I am CFA and has recently started pursuing MBA finance to enhance my skills and professional knowledge.

I have more than 3 years of experience in the field of finance and have achieved employee star award for my exceptional performance.

I have enclosed my CV for your reference.

CV Sample

Huma Saeed +471 26 555 257

Professional experience :

Bank al Hamra 2016 - 2018

Michael page 2018 - present

Qualification:

Bachelors 2014

CFA 2015-2017

MBA 2017 - Present

Learn more at brainly.com/question/24374352

3 0
3 years ago
What is the supreme law of the land in the united states?
NeTakaya
The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
3 years ago
Help me this question
VladimirAG [237]

Answer: I think it's d

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain which type of child care facility James would be best suited for based on the scenario below.
    12·1 answer
  • The possession of ____ is against federal law.
    11·1 answer
  • What is the difference between public forum and private property?
    6·1 answer
  • How do different economic<br> systems help satisfy people's<br> needs?
    10·1 answer
  • What year did Illinois become a state?
    15·1 answer
  • the sum of the ages of farhan and his cousin is 38. Seven years ago, Farhan was thrice as old as his cousin. Find farhan’s prese
    13·1 answer
  • Why do we have laws?
    15·2 answers
  • How long does a bill have to be approved by both houses of Congress?
    11·2 answers
  • Ms. Bosman writes that the verdict is being seen by some as “a win for the notion of self-defense” and others as “a failure of t
    6·1 answer
  • Mr. X house burning down, inside there are two people his aged father who is in a wheelchair and a doctor who has discovered a c
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!