Question

Physical evidence is convincing to juries because it is seen as objective and based on physical reality rather than on witness opinions. True False

Answer 1

Answer:

This statement is True. Physical evidence is seen as more objective.

Explanation:

Witness opinions are considered subjective accounts and they can be subject to bias and inaccuracies so they are seen as less concrete and reliable as evidence. It builds a stronger case against a defendant if the prosecution can provide physical evidence that a crime or wrongdoing occurred. Another related term is circumstantial evidence which would imply that someone might be guilty of a crime without the physical proof, like being caught holding a gun at a crime scene for instance. The circumstantial evidence would be being seen holding the gun; the physical evidence would be proof the bullets came from the gun.