1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erma4kov [3.2K]
3 years ago
5

Why did Egypt's president Nasser nationalize the Suez Canal in 1956?

History
2 answers:
ozzi3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

c) It was a nationalistic and retaliatory move to bring control of the canal under Egypt's command.

Explanation:

Suez Canal was built by French engineers and it remained under the control of England till the president of Egypt Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized. It was a nationalist move to eradicate the control of foreign countries over the canal.

Further Explanation:

The history of the construction of the Suez canal was itself filled with remorse. It is said that thirty thousand workers worked to build it at any given point of time. It took around ten years using forced labor to finish this project. The initiative was taken by the French man Ferdinand DE LesAseps. Although stakes of the company not initially gained global interest but they found a good price in France.

The British invasion of Egypt changed the situation and by the Convention of Constantinople in 1888, it became a neutral zone. The worst of its effect can be seen in the colonization of Africa by Europe.

Suez Canal connects the Mediterranean sea and the Red sea. The geographical advantage of the canal gave a more direct route from the North Atlantic to North Indian ocean and it reduced the distance from London to the Arabian sea. It gave Britain a direct route to obtain oil from Arab nations and thus serve important economic interest. Moreover, it was an important strategic position in the world war.

It remained under the control of Britain by the treaty of 1936. In 1951 the treaty was discarded by Egypt and in 1954 Britain withdraws its troops.

On 26 July 1956 The president of Egypt nationalized the canal and this repose came from the decline of promise by the united kingdom and the united states of America to support the construction of the Aswan dam. President justified its move as the revenue from the Suez canal can supplement the construction of the dam. The reasons were more deep and could be found in the context of the cold war. The inclination of Egypt towards the soviet union created tension in the United States of America and the United Kingdom. And the result was seen in Suez Crises.

Key words: Suez canal, Britain, Egypt.

Learn more: Nationalization of Suez canal  

brainly.com/question/4400173  answerd by Likableadvisers

brainly.com/question/4100454  answerd by Barbaralazarotto

JulijaS [17]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is c)It was a nationalistic and retaliatory move to bring control of the canal under Egypt's command.


Since 1869 the Suez Canal remained under British and French control. After WWII Egypt pressed for evacuation of British troops from the zone of the Canal and President Nasser decided to nationalize the canal.

This started the Suez Crisis that led to Israel invade and British and French troops to occupy the canal zone. Later, in 1957, they withdrew and Egypt took control of the canal and reopened it to commercial shipping.

You might be interested in
True/False. At first President Nixon claimed that U.S. troops had not invaded Cambodia.
Vsevolod [243]
False come on homie you should know this brodie
6 0
3 years ago
Please help
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

a, approves judges

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which was a major trend in Latin American politics during the 1980s
cupoosta [38]
Many Latin America countries are slowly forming democratic governments, as aid to communist groups has disappeared with the collapse of the Soviet Union.
7 0
4 years ago
What happened as a result of frankfert assembely
Doss [256]

Answer:

The Frankfurt National Assembly was at long last ready to embrace a proposed constitution for Germany on March 28, 1849. This report accommodated general document, parliamentary government, and an inherited head. Germany was to have a unified monetary and customs system yet would keep up the inward self-rule of the constituent German states.

Explanation:

A parliamentary parliament met in Frankfurt in March 1848 at the prompting of liberal pioneers from all the German states (Austria also included), and it required the election of a National assembly. The races were appropriately held, however the discretionary laws and techniques differed impressively from state to state, and on May 18 the National assembly met in the Church of St. Paul (Paulskirche) in Frankfurt. Moderate non-conformists held a lion's share in the assembly, however the whole political range was spoken to among its delegates. The liberal Heinrich von Gagern was chosen leader of the parliament.

8 0
3 years ago
Could the effect on the British be more than economic?
JulijaS [17]

Answer:

yesssssssssssssddddddddddddd

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is confederation
    15·2 answers
  • Discuss the term government and its function. In not less than 3 pages​
    13·1 answer
  • Which border state's loyalty to the Union was critical to keeping Washington, D.C. from being surrounded by the Confederacy?
    15·2 answers
  • During world war ii, many african americans and mexican americans migrated to ___ areas to work in manufacturing plants.
    10·2 answers
  • What was the main purpose of the declaration of the rights of man?
    7·2 answers
  • In the mid-1300s, John Wycliffe was
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes how investment in the stock market during the mid-to-late 1920s contributed to the Great
    8·2 answers
  • (03.03 MC)
    7·2 answers
  • The Declaration of Independence is
    14·2 answers
  • How did the railroads affect texas’s population during the late 1800s?.
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!