1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
emmainna [20.7K]
3 years ago
6

Do you think that limiting the amount of foreign television programming is an effective way to protect cultural diversity? Why o

r why not?
History
1 answer:
worty [1.4K]3 years ago
4 0
It is NOT


Cultural diversity and inclusion means we celebrate all kinds of languages, foods, clothes and cultures.

By limiting foreign television, we will be limiting the chance for people to explore, news, Television, and even cartoon content from other countries, which can actually help us to learn a lot about each other.
You might be interested in
To what extent was the NAACP involved in the 1919 race riots?
lutik1710 [3]
Ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff++++++++++++

6 0
3 years ago
How were former Confederate leaders treated under the Radical Reconstruction plan?
raketka [301]

Answer:

They were allowed to obtain federal loans to help restore the cotton industry

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why was the battle of midway considered the turning point of the war in the public
emmainna [20.7K]
The Battle of Midway<span> was a </span>turning point<span> in the Pacific </span>War<span>. Before the </span>Battle<span> of the </span>Coral Sea<span> on 7-8 May 1942, the Imperial Navy of Japan had swept aside all of its enemies from the Pacific and Indian oceans.
If this isn't what your looking for let me know.</span>
8 0
4 years ago
The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clea
Assoli18 [71]

The argument made by Holmes was that the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.

<h3>What is the case of Schenck v. United States?</h3>

The Court determined that a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.

Hence, the Justice of the state made an argument that the the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.

Therefore, the Option C is correct.

Read more about Schenck v. United States

<em>brainly.com/question/2764676</em>

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
What was the main aim of Cavendish’s work?
spin [16.1K]
To experiment the force of gravity between masses
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which event served as a signal to the jews in germany and austria to leave as soon as possible?
    5·1 answer
  • Which Muslim empire's government encouraged religious and cultural tolerance
    14·2 answers
  • Who is associated with the growth of Suburbia?
    11·2 answers
  • What did the Lend-Lease Act do? A. It permitted all warring nations to borrow military equipment from the United States as long
    9·1 answer
  • Apaches and Comanches lived a nomadic lifestyle for many years. How did this affect the attempts of the Spanish missionaries to
    13·1 answer
  • Can someone pls answer this thxxxxx
    9·1 answer
  • Turkmenistan’s government has embraced ____________ and ordered its schools to teach the religion’s key principles to students.
    10·1 answer
  • Identify the statement that best describes the changes in the front lines between June and November of 1918. Click or tap a choi
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP! ILL MARK BRAINLIEST TO WHOEVER ANSWERS FIRST!!! ...
    13·1 answer
  • Who did the Angel Gabriel tell to write the Qur'an ?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!