Answer:
It is not true that historians have the freedom to omit parts of evidence that they do not agree with.
Explanation:
Historians are academic professionals whose job is to collect events that occurred in the past, interpret them, and explain their development and consequences, including making connections between those events in the past and events in the present.
For this reason, historians cannot suppress content or events with which they do not agree, because if they did, they would be modifying the course of events and, therefore, reproducing an account of the events that would not coincide with reality.
The summit did not resulted in a positive outcome, instead it started a whole new Cold War game on June 3.4. 1961.
On the one hand, Nikita Khrushchev took harsh position over Berlin, a Western spot within communist-controlled East Germany. On the other hand, in that summit Kennedy made it clear that he was not willing to withdraw from Berlin. As a result, there was not progress in the negotiations. However, according to Nikita´s words, in that summit, “Kennedy held a stance through which he was willing to find a peaceful solution to world problems and avoiding conflict with the Soviet Union.”
Following the Summit, the Berlin wall was erected two months later and the Cuban Missile Crisis led the world to the verge of nuclear war in 1962.
Answer:
323453223345467755&&$$';&&&$;(767&&6445
Explanation:
Dfggrfggyttggggggg
Smooth road bc the others might enforce some type of friction on the ball cause it to go slower
