I am not entirely sure about me answer please forgive me if I'm wrong but I believe it is level of production cost
The settlers saw the right to take possession of western lands and use them as they saw fitting as an essential element of American freedom. Settlers paid no attention to Indian land titles and admonished the government to set a low price on public land or give it away and regularly occupied land to which they had no legal title. Numerous settlers are also concerned unregulated population of lands west of Appalachian Mountains would aggravate constant warfare with Indians and viewed frontier settlers as disorganized and lacking reverence for authority.
Answer:
hi your question is incomplete here is the complete question
How did Sulla help turn the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire?
A- He angered the Senate by proposing that Rome divide public lands among the returning military and their families.
B- He replaced the elected consuls and the Senate with an empire that could be inherited by members of the ruler's family.
C-He angered the Senate by convincing men to serve in wars by promising them land and citizenship.
D- He restructured the city's politics and strengthened the Senate's power.
Answer : He restructured the city's politics and strengthened the senate's power ( D )
Explanation:
Sulla born 138 BC was a Roman general and a very important figure in Rome during his time as General. he also serve as a Roman consul. he was not born into power but became a leader because of his military achievements. he was also the first General that marched to Rome with his legion in other to take political power.
He restructured the City's politics and strengthened the senate's power. the senate in turn he revived the dictatorship rule by appointing him a dictator which helped turned Rome from been a republic to becoming an Empire
Answer:The treaty violations by the United States and late and unfair annuities by the Indian Agents had caused increasing problems on hunger and poverty among the settlers and the Native Americans. Many Dakotan traders had demanded that annuities must be paid or else they will stopped providing goods on credit basis.
Explanation:The US government signed two treaties with the Sioux in exchange for large portions of the Minnesota Territory in 1851. The Treaty said that the land would be given in exchange for compensation in the form of annuity cash payments and trade goods.
The problem was that the organization was poor and corrupt and the resources did not get to the Sioux. Things got worse when Minnesota entered the Union and the government repossessed half of the territory and gave it to white settlers. All of this was the perfect storm for the Sioux uprising in 1862.
Maybe this will help you
The 3 differences and similarities between the old and new city-states were:
Difference 1. The Old City States were developed around a proto-socialist economy which was mostly controlled by the government.
The new city States were more developed around personal enterprise where independent people could earn money.
Difference 2: Old city States had a social structure that consisted of a 'Farmer' class which worked in the plantations. In the new city States, this work was conducted by poor people who could earn a living or get food return. The work was not dependent on a 'specific' class of people anymore.
Difference 3: In the Old City States, the status of governing officials was based on wealth and power. In the new City States, the Kings had succession plans and power was inherited from father to son.
Similarity 1: Both city States were far from democracies and power was concentrated in the hands of a very few people.
Similarity 2: Most of the work was done by people who were basically poor. Either as farmers, peasants or slaves.
Similarity 3: Both cities were vulnerable during times of floods, droughts and natural disasters. They were eventually overrun by powerful nomads.
