Answer:
I think the figure of N and E of 48in is 2304. The figure of I and E and N and A of 32in is 1024. The figure of L and I and L and A is 144.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the area, you have to multiply of each side in each figure. For example, Figure A and B and C and D of 16in is 16 × 16 which is 256.
A = Area
a = Side
A = 2304, A = a^2 = 48^2 = 2304.
A = 1024, A = a^2 = 32^2 = 1024.
A = 144, A = a^2 = 12^2 = 144.
I hope this answers your question!
Answer:
Midpoint isdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16707/1670711d7bb13b974bfd720a821cb76562915d8f" alt="(-25.15,10.2)"
Step-by-step explanation:
A line segment refers to line that has two endpoints.
Let
be the endpoints of a line segment.
Midpoint of the line segment is given by data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f60c/0f60caf7040d75dd17164a5c7e40cd00fca9afa0" alt="(\frac{a+c}{2} ,\frac{b+d}{2})"
Take the given points as follows:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e08cf/e08cf4af1a8cb1588da5c7086e289c66c65995f8" alt="(a,b)=(-24.6,38.1)\\(c,d)=(-25.7,-17.7)"
Midpoint of a line segment data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15dbe/15dbecfc9e5a92ce6df3e6af8090cb8ae33ffc9a" alt="=(\frac{-24.6-25.7}{2},\frac{28.1-17.7}{2})"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d75b3/d75b3d40aab836de127382699a267613782132e0" alt="=(\frac{-50.3}{2} ,\frac{20.4}{2} )\\=(-25.15,10.2)"
Answer:
6u+7u-16=-81
We simplify the equation to the form, which is simple to understand
6u+7u-16=-81
We move all terms containing u to the left and all other terms to the right.
+6u+7u=-81+16
We simplify left and right side of the equation.
+13u=-65
We divide both sides of the equation by 13 to get u.
u=-5
Step-by-step explanation:
I think i did it correct
Answer:
Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."
Step-by-step explanation:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.
Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.
However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".
The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.