1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariana [72]
3 years ago
14

Otto von Bismarck was an influential leader in _______ during the late 1800s.

History
2 answers:
Citrus2011 [14]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is A. Germany.

Hope this helps :)

Molodets [167]3 years ago
4 0

otto von bismark was a influential leadet in france during the late 1800

You might be interested in
After the United States declared war on Germany, approximately how long did it take for over a million Amer
Alex Ar [27]

Answer: One year

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Children’s books are an example of
Vikentia [17]

Answer:

How Images and words work together.

Explanation:

On a grind for my first brainlist crown thing :)

EDIT: just saw that you completed it. This comment is now for people who need the answer from now on.

5 0
3 years ago
PLS HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

4= republicans believe in cutting taxes

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the British act alone during king Leopolds rule
Julli [10]

Answer:

Mark as brainliest

Explanation:

symbolic presence in international legal accounts of the 19th century, but for historians of the era its importance has often been doubted. This article seeks to re-interpret the place of the Berlin General Act in late 19th-century history, suggesting that the divergence of views has arisen largely as a consequence of an inattentiveness to the place of systemic logics in legal regimes of this kind.

Issue Section:

 Articles

INTRODUCTION

The Berlin West Africa Conference of 1884-1885 has assumed a canonical place in historical accounts of late 19th-century imperialism 1 and this is no less true of the accounts provided by legal scholars seeking to trace the colonial origins of contemporary international law. 2 The overt purpose of the Conference was to ‘manage’ the ongoing process of colonisation in Africa (the ‘Scramble’ as it was dubbed by a Times columnist) so as to avoid the outbreak of armed conflict between rival colonial powers. Its outcome was the conclusion of a General Act 3 ratified by all major colonial powers including the US. 4 Among other things, the General Act set out the conditions under which territory might be acquired on the coast of Africa; it internationalised two rivers (the Congo and the Niger); it orchestrated a new campaign to abolish the overland trade in slaves; and it declared as ‘neutral’ a vast swathe of Central Africa delimited as the ‘conventional basin of the Congo’. A side event was the recognition given to King Leopold’s fledgling Congo Free State that had somewhat mysteriously emerged out of the scientific and philanthropic activities of the Association internationale du Congo . 5

If for lawyers and historians the facts of the Conference are taken as a common starting point, this has not prevented widely divergent interpretations of its significance from emerging. On one side, one may find an array of international lawyers, from John Westlake 6 in the 19th century to Tony Anghie 7 in the 21 st century, affirming the importance of the Conference and its General Act for having created a legal and political framework for the subsequent partition of Africa. 8 For Anghie, Berlin ‘transformed Africa into a conceptual terra nullius ’, silencing native resistance through the subordination of their claims to sovereignty, and providing, in the process, an effective ideology of colonial rule. It was a conference, he argues, ‘which determined in important ways the future of the continent and which continues to have a profound influence on the politics of contemporary Africa’. 9

5 0
3 years ago
Discuss the impact of discrimination behaviour the individual and on society​
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

Discrimination impact badly on people.

Explanation:

Discrimination has a negative impact on people's prospects, equally poorly, and confidence. Individuals who are subjected to discrimination on a regular basis can internalize the bigotry or stigma aimed at them, resulting in feelings of guilt, poor self, anxiety, and anxiety, and also poor health and bad condition.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When were africans first brought yo the United states ti ne used as slaves?
    8·1 answer
  • What would be considered a major cause of the Civil War
    5·1 answer
  • What happened after the fall of Rome
    10·1 answer
  • What abolitionist recognized Fredrick Douglass’ oratory skill and hired him as a speaker for the Massachusetts anti-slavery soci
    12·2 answers
  • Does the colossal statue of Constantine serve as a historical record of an event, movement, or time period
    15·2 answers
  • How did the entrance of the Aryans into the weakened Indus Valley differ from that of other pastoralist migrations into Egypt, M
    15·1 answer
  • Why did khrushchev support the building of the berlin wall?
    10·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of government? Select a quotation from a US president. Then, write an argumentative essay that explains why
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone pls help its in the picture btw
    15·2 answers
  • Parliament did not succeed in isolating Massachusetts from the other colonies. What evidence from the text supports this conclus
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!