Seeking therapy help is the best.
A few native animals in the old world are pigs, chicken
Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Explanation: It is true that allegiance to a tribe is one handicap to national unity in Africa. When Africa was divided into countries, it did so with little consultation of local people.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be the "</span><span>(1) ideas of John Locke," since he is referencing the "social contract" that Locke said existed between citizens and the government--a contract Jefferson believed the British had broken. </span>