Answer:
The correct answer is A that is smoothing out the random fluctuations.
Explanation:
The higher values of K states the greater number of the values which need to be consider for forecasting.
When consider or taking the larger or the higher value of the irregular fluctuation which could be decreased or reduced.
And as a consequence, the large value of K will be used for smoothing of the random fluctuations.
Therefore, the right answer is smoothing of the random fluctuations.
Answer:
The share of each additional dollar of income earned that is devoted to saving rather than consumption.
Explanation:
The marginal propensity to save is defined as the fraction of increased income that is reserved for saving and not consumption, and it is the slope of the graph of income against savings.
For example if an individual earns an extra dollar and he has propensity to save of 0.5 that means out of the one dollar he will save 50 cents and spend the remaining 50 cents.
Answer:
9.85%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Initial Offer price = $23.45
Current NAV = $22.28
Dividends and capital gains distributions over the year = $1.09 per share
Now,
Holding period return
= [Current NAV + Dividends and capital gains distributions - Initial Offer price ] ÷ Initial Offer price
= [ $24.67 + $1.09 - $23.45 ] ÷ $23.45
= $2.31 ÷ $23.45
= 0.0985
or
= 0.0985 × 100%
= 9.85%
Answer:
Their earnings per share may decrease.
Explanation:
Shareholders of a company may be reluctant to finance expansion through issuing more equity because Their earnings per share may decrease and at the same time debt is always better option to finance.
Answer:
Explanation:
MIRR equation is given by :
[(FV +ve cashflow / PV -ve cashflow)^(1/n)] - 1
FV +ve cashflow = Future value of positive cashflow at reinvestment rate
PV - ve cashflow = Present value of negative cashflow at finance rate
n = number of periods
The Modified Internal Rate of Return is a devised modification for the Internal rate of return, IRR which gives rate of return on percentage and overcomes the limitations of the IRR formula.