Discuss the position of the Anti-federalists on ratifying the Constitution

1 answer:

8 0

Anti-Federalists were completely against the Constitution and favored the Articles of Confederation (which failed). They wanted stronger state governments and a weaker federal government, which is the opposite of what the Constitution did and exactly what the Articles of Confederation did (which again failed). They also didn't want to ratify the Constitution at first because it didn't contain the Bill of Rights, so citizens would be guaranteed protection of freedom of speech and trial by jury.

Hope this helps :)

You might be interested in

Whenever the other house of Congress significantly alters a bill, a(n) (A:enumerations B:design C:Phearings D:conference) commit

nydimaria [60]

Yeah the answer is A

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Most followers of which religion or philosophy live in east and southeast asia?.

Softa [21]

Answer:

Of the five religions provided in your question, Buddhism and Confucianism have the majority of their followers in East and Southeast Asia.

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

what is the name of the large island body of water bordered by Iran, azerbaijan, russia, kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan

Bingel [31]

The Caspian Sea. :) It's the world's largest inland body of water.

6 0

3 years ago

What is the common opinion about drug abuse?

Alisiya [41]

Answer: drug abuse runs anywhere and everywhere which affects the community which can bring down many things and also affect a lots of lives

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A generally accepted understanding of "comparative politics" is that it is a method of explaining similarities and differences b

ch4aika [34]

Answer:

Comparative politics is investigating internal processes within countries or political entities by comparing their characteristics according to a specific model. Though it can potentially address a wide range of aspects, comparative politics is most widely applied to such issues as politics of democratic and authoritarian states, political identity, regime change and democratization, voting behavior and a number of others.

Comparativists often ask how certain processes, for example, democratization, differ in specific states that still can be placed under the same analysis because they share certain characteristics.

Following the democratization example, let us take post-soviet countries. Comparativists may take most similar countries that share many similarities, such as Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), or most different countries, such as Estonia and Belarus. Here comparativists may ask, why Estonia developed a strong democratic regime, while Belarus fell into a consolidated authoritarian regime.

4 0

2 years ago