Answer:
1. Some event in the past may lack sources that tell what really happened without contradicting it.
2. There is total truth about most events that have happened in the past.
3. An interpretation based on facts and evidence becomes more credible than another.
Explanation:
It is important that we know what happened in the past to encourage behaviors that worked and not repeat the same mistakes that citizens have made in the past. In short, the success of the future depends on a full understanding of events that occurred in the past and were able to influence how we live today.
For this reason, it is important that major events are fully and fully documented. These documents will serve to show the citizens of the future what happened and what were its consequences, without addressing contradictions, but addressing facts and evidence. Without these documents, the study of the past becomes very difficult.
It is important to remember that these documents show facts that show the history as it was, as an absolute truth, leaving no scope for incorrect interpretations. An example of this can be seen today in Brazil. Brazil underwent a strong military dictatorship in its past and although there are many documents that prove all the violence and absurdities of that time, many people say that this moment may have been positive, depending on the way that each interprets it.
It was "mountain ranges in the north and west" that helped India develop for thousands of years in this way, since these mountains were very hard to cross with large armies.
The Townshend Acts would use the revenue raised by the duties to pay the salaries of colonial governors and judges, ensuring the loyalty of America's governmental officials to the British Crown. However, these policies prompted colonists to take action by boycotting British goods.
Hope this helps!
Please give brainliest bro!
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Complete Question:
Both the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the Freedom Rides were successful in that they resulted in the integration of transportation. What was the difference in the way the successful outcomes were achieved
A. The Freedom Rides were successful despite having no central organization involved in the planning; the Montgomery Bus Boycott was supported by the NAACP.
B. The Freedom Rides succeeded due to federal intervention; the Montgomery Boycott succeeded due to local economic pressure.
C. The success of the Freedom Rides did not require the intervention of law enforcement; the Montgomery Bus Boycott involved local police.
D. The success of the Freedom Rides was due to the support of the American public, the success of the Montgomery Bus Boycott stemmed from international pressure.
The Montgomery Bus Boycott started due to Rosa Parks a black woman been arrested after she refused to give up her seat so that a white passenger could sit in it in Montgomery, Alabama. The Montgomery Bus Boycott was instigated against the policy of racial segregation on the public transit system of transportation. As a result of the boycott, Montgomery City Lines <u>suffered financially</u> by losing between 30,000 and 40,000 bus fares each day for a period of) 381 days(from December 5, 1955, to December 20. 1956, the bus boycott ended successfully after the Supreme Court upheld the district court's ruling that segregation on public buses and transportation was against the law.
The Freedom Rides was a political protest in 1961 by civil rights activists as a result of non-enforcement of the United States Supreme Court decisions which ruled that segregated public buses were unconstitutional. The ride was carried out by seven blacks and six whites left Washington, D.C into the segregated Southern United States which leads more than 400 volunteers who traveled towards the Southern United States after the first set of the freedom ride passengers were assaulted. The Riders were <u>successful in convincing the Federal Government</u> to enforce Supreme Court decisions.
He means that whatever we do is for mankind. All the work is for the development of the humans.
