1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrey2020 [161]
3 years ago
14

Which statement BEST describes the significance of President Andrew Jackson’s response to the Supreme Court’s decision? A It sho

wed how the system of checks and balances worked effectively. B It established the rule that the president outranks the Chief Justice. C It upheld the president’s constitutional right to veto Supreme Court decisions. D It ignored the Supreme Court’s authority to interpret the Constitution.
History
1 answer:
GREYUIT [131]3 years ago
3 0

In the case between Georgia and Cherokee nation, the significance of President Andrew Jackson's response to the Supreme Court's decision was:

D. It ignored the Supreme Court's authority to interpret the Constitution.

President Andrew Jackson stated that he believed the Congress, the Executive and the Court had each on itself be guided by its own opinion of the Consitution. Even though, he is attributed to have said "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.", regarding the Court's decision in favor of the Cherokee nation. By saying this he ignores the Court's authority to interpret the Constitution and its lack of power to enforce their decision over his own.

You might be interested in
Initially, the MOST successful European colonial power was
sammy [17]
Spain, Hope this helps :)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For each of the titles for people in the feudal system, identify if a person with that title would support the feudal system in
WARRIOR [948]
Panese Feudal System
Just like England in Medieval times, Japan also had a feudal system. It was structured very similarly to the English setup with a few changes of names and positions. The most powerful positions in society were the Emperor, Shogun, Daimyo and Samurai. Although these 4 positions were the most powerful in Japan at the time, they made up only roughly 10% of the total population, while roughly 90% were peasants and below.
Picture
The Emperor was looked up to by all of his people as the supreme ruler but held little political power and was seen as more of a 'puppet figure'.

The Shogun was probably the most important figure in Japanese society. He was seen as 'second in line' but did the most work. He was a military leader, so he was in charge of many of decisions to do with their armies, battles etc..

The Daimyo was a very powerful figure who served the shogun. His job control a large area of land. He was also in charge of their samurai, whom he paid to work and protect him.

The Samurai were Japanese warriors (similar to the European knight). They served and protected their Daimyo with respect. They also fought for their people and protected them, bringing justice and order to the community. Their followed a code of conduct called Bushido, meaning 'Way of the warrior' which told them how to live their lives.

Ronins were samurai warriors who had either been 'expelled' from their allegiance or their daimyo had died.

Peasants were farmers and fishermen. They were actually considered a higher class in Medieval Japan than in Medieval England because the Japanese believed that the peasants produced food, which was depended on by all classes, therefore, they worked harder.

Artisans were workers skilled in a particular trade. These included: sword-maker, dressmaker, woodblock print making etc.

Merchants were considered the lowest class in Medieval Japan unlike Medieval England. Their job was to trade/sell goods and shop-keep.
4 0
3 years ago
Where did Muhammad believe his instructions came from? A. the devil B. the angel Gabriel C. Jesus Christ D. Jewish law
musickatia [10]
<span>B. the angel Gabriel.........</span>
4 0
3 years ago
We need Trump back he put God first back in this country.
antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

Thx for the points G

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the "solution" the Ottoman Empire came to for the Armenian "problem?"
klemol [59]

Turkish revolutionaries waged the Turkish War of Independence against Ottoman loyalists and neighboring countries, and engaged in continuing conflict with the Democratic Republic of Armenia. On September 24, 1920, Turkish forces invaded and advanced unto Sarighamish and Kars resulting in the Turkish–Armenian War.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • write a letter to the king of france as a peasant explaining the hardships you are facing, what your grievances are, and what th
    14·1 answer
  • What is the importance of jacksonian Democracy
    13·1 answer
  • What did the union government tax in order to help make the cost of the war
    12·1 answer
  • Name three sounds Riis describes in the tenements. Please help me
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following types of political systems have only one person
    9·1 answer
  • Cite algumas medidas tomadas por Getúlio Vargas no início de seu mandato e explique de que maneira elas culminaram na Revolução
    7·1 answer
  • Can someone please please help me :( please?
    12·1 answer
  • Why do some plants eat meat?
    6·1 answer
  • Hey can anyone pls pls pls answer dis!!!
    8·1 answer
  • The treaty of versailles overlooked the importance of
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!