I think it’s Mongolia and China. Again I’m not sure so I’m sorry if I got it wrong.
hello there
Andrea's point is probably the answer you're looking for, however, you should keep in mind that many (most?) environmental laws are driven more by politics than by the available data. Scientists do research on any number of topics (environmental or not) that have implications for our society. We (scientists) like to think that policy makers take our data and results into consideration when drafting legislation, but I would say that in my experience this rarely happens. For one, there have rarely been any federal legislators who understand science. Even the few physicians who've gone into politics seem largely to fail to understand very basic tenets of science, or at least they don't often demonstrate it with their political actions. Leaving environmental issues, for example, if politicians took science into account, there would be no discussion in any school district in the country about whether or not evolution should be taught in schools, as there are simply *NO* scientists who are qualified to have an opinion who would suggest it shouldn't. Environmental issues are not really any different.
hope that helped bye
Bottlenecks: points where tasks accumulate and the process flow is slowed. These should be analyzed and the problem solved. Read more about bottlenecks.
Points of contact with the customer: should always be fully satisfying experiences. Monitor them, as these are the times when the customer “judges” the company.
Determine the value - adding activities: these should be improved the most. Those that do not add value should be stopped.
Hi
The answer is : Mexicans Cession
Answer:
lithosphere
The geosphere is considered to comprise the entire earth solid atmosphere. The earth is also into two parts the interior and the exterior core, the mantle and the crust.
