Explanation:
Win-win approach to reward
allocations
A ‘con’ maybe? only thing i can think of
Recording the transaction of providing travel services to the travelers, who paid $22,500 with a balance of $4,500 in the books of the Travel Services Corporation include:
Journal Entries:
Debit Cash $22,500
Debit Accounts Receivable $4,500
Credit Service Revenue $27,000
- To record the provision of travel services for cash and on credit.
Data Analysis:
Cash $22,500 Accounts Receivable $4,500 Service Revenue $27,000
Thus, the total service revenue recorded for this transaction is $27,000.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/16781277
Answer:
I beleive this one would be a bit of a matter of opinion when it comes down to it, but personally I would call it a bit unethical.
Explanation:
Escpecially when it comes to something like medication, it feels unethical to be advertising yourself as the only brand that will work. In my mind unique selling proposition would be focusing on what differentiates your product from others (example, my product can provide 48 hour vs other brands that only offer 24 hour) Simply stating their brand is the only solution feels unethical and does not provide ample evidence of this claim to customers in my opinion. I don't think it would be considered illegal, but in my mind its tiptoeing the line of ethics.
Answer:
4%
Explanation:
For Builtrite, we can find the probability of cash flows by using the following formula:
Z = (X - C) / S
Average Cash Flow is $16000 which denoted by "C"
Standard Deviation is $4000 and is denoted by "S"
And
For cash flows that are less than $9000 which is denoted by X in the equation, "Z" can be calculated as under:
Z = (X - C) / S = ($9,000 - $16,000) / $4,000 = -1.75
As Z is less than -1.75, now we can see that the probability from the Z-table is 4% for -1.75.
Hence the probability of cash flow below $9,000 is 4%.
