Correct answer:
<h2>Limited government</h2>
The 10th Amendment puts limits on the powers of the federal government. It reserves powers for the states (and for the people themselves) any powers not specifically designated to the federal government in the United States Constitution. Any laws and powers exercised by the states still must be in accord with what is stated in the US Constitution, however.
For some historical context, we might also consider that the original framers of the US Constitution thoughts that statements such as the 10th Amendment -- and all of the first 10 Amendments, known as the Bill of Rights -- were already inherent in the Constitution as it was written. They had composed a constitution that intentionally placed limits on the federal government. So, stating such a limit in an amendment seemed like a repetition of what was already apparent in the Constitution itself. As noted by the National Constitution Center, "The Constitution’s Framers thought that a bill of rights was appropriate for an unlimited government, but not for a limited one like the national government created by the Constitution. The Constitution accordingly sought to secure liberty through enumerations of powers to the government rather than through enumerations of rights to the people."
Nevertheless, to assure those who wanted the rights of the people specifically listed and protected, Amendments 1 through 10 were added to the Constitution as a Bill of Rights to affirm those protections.
Nationalists and Republicans waged a civil war against each other during the mid-to-late 1930s in Spain.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
The civil war that took place in Spain in the year of 1936 till 1939. This war was against the nationalists and the republicans where the nationalists had got the support in form of soldiers and the air support from Nazi in Germany and the republican had got support from the Soviet Union and Mexico.
This war was seen as the war between the democracy and the republicans and a war of the religions or a war of class because of the various facets that the war between these two groups had.
Abolitionism is one of the many factors that lead to conflict between northern and southern states. This movement focused on getting rid of the institution of slavery. By emancipating (freeing) these slaves, Southern plantation owners would suffer a significant loss in profits, as slaves were not paid for their work.
This threat to Southern society caused them to rebel against this idea and any individual who supported it. This fear of freeing slaves ultimately lead in the secession of the Southern states, as the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 posed a serious threat to their way of life.
After the defeat of Japan in World War II, the United States led the Allies in the occupation and rehabilitation of the Japanese state. Between the years 1945 and 1952, the U.S. occupying forces, led by General Douglas A. MacArthur, enacted widespread military, political, economic, and social reforms.
<u>Strategic and Organic Activism:</u>
Strategic activism refers to highly planned involvement that demands nothing else but only the necessary input to be brought into operation to fetch the desired output. On the other hand, organic activism refers to the use of conventional means and methods without putting much emphasis on expected results.
In order to strictly bring about the desired results, it is mandatory to have a strategic plan about what is to be done to achieve only what is wanted. Thus, when an individual or an institution sticks to the plan and operates accordingly, it is referred to as strategic activism. Organic activism, on the contrary, is simply logrolling to get hold of whatever the result is.