Answer:
Bagley's ethical decision tree
Explanation:
Is the proposed action legal? If yes, does the proposed action maximize shareholder value? If yes, is the proposed action ethical? If no, would it be ethical not to take the proposed action? These are four questions that managers of all organizations should ask when confronted with a decision on an action according to Bagley's ethical decision tree
Bagley's ethical decision tree is mostly used on making ethical decision, it says a decision tree can be used to make the right choices and ultimately do the right thing especially in a situation where there is no obvious right or wrong decision but rather a right or wrong answer.
The correct answer is <span>comorbidity</span>. Comorbidity is the occurence of one or more diseases or disorders that occur along side the main disorder or the disease. A comorbidity is a single additional disorder or disease and there can be multiple of these. The example would be depression and alongside it alcohol dependence as a comorbidity.
Answer:
Exchanges rate systems
Explanation:
permit sthe government to place somen influence
on an exchange rate the would otherwise be freely floating
<span>Psychologists call martial's awareness of the world and himself as Consciousness.
</span><span>
</span><span>Consciousness is the knowledge that a being has of himself and also of his environment. Consciousness implies various cognitive processes, which allows the interaction with the environment, the interpretation of events and the association and interpretation of external stimuli. It can be classified in sensitive consciousness to the interpretation of external stimuli, and abstract consciousness to the processes of interpretation of thought.
</span><span>
</span><span>I hope this information can help you.</span>
Answer:
Spearman believed that people who are intelligent in maths are usually not intelligent in verbal skills
While Thurstone believed that people who are intelligent in one Areas are usually intelligent in all areas.
Explanation:
My believe aligns with Spearman in that people who are intelligent with mathematics are usually not intelligent with verbal skills, mathematical skill involved being analytical , manipulative and while verbal skill deals with how you approach words, comprehend meanings. So one might be very analytical with very good approach to problem solving but might not be really good at putting words together and making substantial meaning out of it.
