Answer:
the fact that he died because of a police officer
if u mean after the death, than people destroying buildings and looting.
Explanation:
To relocate Native Americans to the east of the U.S.A's territory
Http://www.history.com/news/10-things-you-may-not-know-about-the-battle-of-bunker-hill
1. The Battle of Bunker Hill was actually not fought on Bunker Hill.
―― <span>Tasked on the night of June 16, 1775, with fortifying 110-foot-tall Bunker Hill on the Charlestown peninsula, which jutted into Boston Harbor, Colonel William Prescott instead directed the 1,000 patriots joining him to build an earthen fort atop neighboring Breed’s Hill, a shorter peak with a closer perch to the British under siege in Boston.
2. The Patriots sought to delay a British attack but instead provoked one.
―― </span><span>Seeking to break the siege of Boston, the British planned to launch a massive attack on June 18, 1775, to seize the two promontories overlooking the city—first Dorchester Heights to the south and then Bunker Hill to the north. When patriot leaders received intelligence that an assault was imminent, they directed Prescott to fortify Bunker Hill as a deterrent. Prescott’s provocative action to instead occupy Breed’s Hill, within cannon shot of the Redcoats, forced the British to change plans, respond to the overt challenge and launch an amphibious assault on Charlestown.
</span>
3. The British won the battle.
―― <span>Often obscured by the moral victory earned by the Patriots is that they ultimately lost the military battle. After the colonial militiamen repelled the first two British assaults, they ran out of ammunition during the third attack and were forced to abandon their redoubt. The fierce defense, however, inflicted heavy casualties on the Redcoats, demonstrated the ability of the Patriots to fight toe-to-toe with the British and boosted the colonists’ confidence.
</span>
4. <span>It was one of the bloodiest battles of the American Revolution.
</span>―― <span>Victory at Bunker Hill came at a terrible price for the British, with nearly half of the 2,200 Redcoats who entered the battle killed or wounded in just two hours of fighting. The Patriots sustained over 400 casualties. “The loss we have sustained is greater than we can bear,” wrote British General Thomas Gage. “I wish [we] could sell them another hill at the same price,” quipped patriot leader Nathanael Greene after the battle.
</span>
Answer:
A is the answer
Explanation:
He was a fierce warrior and in the end it says "That was one good king"
The website is the secondary, good and can be biased source of information.
Are websites reliable sources of knowledge?
Although government websites are reliable, watch out for sites that are trying to trick you by using these suffixes. Websites run by nonprofit organizations may also include trustworthy information, but you should take some time to analyze these factors to see if they might be biased.
Do websites serve as the primary source of information?
If a website synthesizes, analyses, and processes data from primary sources, it qualifies as a secondary source. A secondary source website may contain published blog entries, review articles, bibliographies, reference volumes, indexes, journals, commentaries, and treatises as well as other types of information.
Learn more about the website as a source of information with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11170060
#SPJ4
