1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stira [4]
3 years ago
9

How did the end of the Vietnam War affect American citizens? It divided them. It united them. It led them to support the Democra

tic Party. It led them to support the Republican Party.
History
2 answers:
valentina_108 [34]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Divided Them

Explanation:

In a way that was never seen before, the Vietnam War tore the United States apart as people either supported the Government or lost all faith in the US Government.

loris [4]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is A. It divided them

Explanation:

The Vietnam War was a conflict between 1955 and 1975 that involved the U.S. as the government decided to military support South Vietnam against North Vietnam that was supported by China and the Soviet Union. Despite the American losses in this war, the whole war had a great impact in the U.S. mainly because the country was divided in those that supported the involvement of the U.S. in a foreign war and those that believed this was immoral and should be stopped; also, many citizens felt the government was not considering their opinion and was manipulating the media to show the war was positive, this decision also divided the support of different political parties. Therefore, the Vietnam war mainly divided American citizens.

You might be interested in
What factor do plessy v Ferguson brown v board of education and regents of California v bakke have in common
IgorC [24]
They all have something to do with race.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Firsthand information that has been analyzed, interpreted or processed is an example of a
vladimir1956 [14]
Secondary source-/————————-—
7 0
3 years ago
Assassination attempts, threats, and conspiracies surrounding Dr. King.
pishuonlain [190]

The claim of another shooter

In 1993, Jowers told ABC's Sam Donaldson that Ray didn't kill King and that he knew who was paid to do it. That account provoked a new round of questions about King's murder. But Jowers didn't want to say more unless the district attorney granted him immunity from prosecution.

James Earl Ray, ailing and serving a 99-year prison sentence, once again pushed for a way to re-open the case. And thus began another investigation.

Local prosecutors in Memphis, including John Campbell, were assigned to look at claims by Jowers and others.

"You know there was a lot of people that all of a sudden, yes, just came out of the woodwork," Campbell said.

Investigators went back and interviewed people who were at Jowers' bar and grill in 1968. Campbell's investigation concluded that many of those people failed to back him up.

One witness who was supporting Jowers decades after the killing allegedly told her sister that she was motivated by the prospect of money, in a call that was overheard by investigators. And Jowers himself changed his tune, from what he told the FBI at the time of the murder.

"Within a couple of weeks, we figured out this first story wasn't going to go anywhere, it wasn't true," Campbell said.

Something else was happening around that time — the launching of another investigation, this time, by the Justice Department under President Bill Clinton.

Veteran civil rights prosecutor Barry Kowalski, who worked on the federal case against the police who beat Rodney King in 1991, led that effort.

"We conducted a conscientious and a thorough investigation and just like the four official investigations before it, found no credible evidence or reliable evidence that Dr. King was killed by conspirators who framed James Earl Ray," Kowalski told NPR.

Justice Department prosecutors interviewed 200 witnesses and reviewed tens of thousands of documents. They found Jowers and the theory of a government directed conspiracy were not credible. And they wrote that they discounted other allegations, claims the murder was somehow linked to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Kowalski said that none of the subsequent theories or inquiries ever disproved the initial one: that Ray killed King, acting alone.

"I remain absolutely convinced that those well founded findings were correct," he said.

///

Of course you have to rephrase this is your own words because I literally just copied and pasted. Hope this gave you an idea of what to write.

3 0
3 years ago
What is the differ between Rigel and the sun
Masja [62]
I hope it works I found it I wanted to help you!!

8 0
3 years ago
What are characteristics of the legislative branch
Serga [27]

It has congress & the senate in it together to pass laws. Like, a bill comes from congress and congess then passes it on to the senate. The senate could deny the bill if the less majority rules in the senete, it is gone if more than it goes on to the president which is the exective branch he can veto (reject) the bill or it could turn into a law. I hope this helps XD.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the US benefits of the Panama Canal
    14·2 answers
  • What policy did Portugal follow with its colony of Angola
    10·2 answers
  • NEED HELP ASAP!!<br> Define han dynasty in own words <br> please will give brainlest if own words
    10·1 answer
  • **Someone help please... this will be 4 questions**
    12·1 answer
  • How did the world populate.
    11·1 answer
  • Why did King Harold defeat Hardrada at the Battle of Stamford bridge?
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ILL DO ANYTHINGGG IN OWN WORDS
    9·1 answer
  • Why did The Crusades fail?​
    6·1 answer
  • What was the philosophy in parsenon
    11·1 answer
  • Help me please !!!!<br> Why is Crockett against removal even though he, himself, is an American?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!