1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tekilochka [14]
3 years ago
12

Nancy has a history of severe sexual abuse in her family and has currently been abusing drugs and alcohol in order to forget her

past. What would be the reason her doctor would not diagnose her with amnesia?
Social Studies
2 answers:
Elina [12.6K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Nancy's lapse in memory is due to substance abuse

Explanation:

While Amnesia will result from damage to a brain structure in the limbic system, responsible for emotions and memories, often known as neurological amnesia.

Nancy has rather a self-caused forgetting which is enabled by

use of drugs like benzodiazepines or sedatives, alcohol, marijuana often causes forgetting effects yet amnesia is a disorder that generally speaking arises as a result of a brain injury or a severe mental health conditions

Today we know that certain substance called beta-blockers help destabilize painful or fearful memories that ofter are hard to forget.

Persons that are suffering in a relationship can have certain periods where they solve substance abuse and taking alcohol with drugs often leads to a substance called metyrapone that blocks the synthesis of the cortisol.

The stress hormone cortisol is suppressed allowing the person to "forget those painful moments".

Since many people solve to drugs and their negative effects are severe, by no means, this will be a solution.

It would be always advised to seek help and gain better insight to deal with circumstances cleverly.

Andru [333]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Due to substance abuse

Explanation:

Only available answer that we have enough given knowledge on.

You might be interested in
Which of the following cases would the U.S. Supreme Court be the first to hear?
Ket [755]

Answer:

Option C, a criminal trial involving a U.S. ambassador, is the right answer.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the federal court structure of the United States. The procedures of the Supreme Court takes place following the constitution of the United States along with various federal laws and the internal regulations of the court. The court has the appellate authority over all the federal as well as the state courts that incorporates a constitutional law.

Though the Supreme Court hears appeals from the lower courts it is all up to the Supreme Court that which case to be heard first.

Therefore, in the given options C will be the first case to be heard by the Supreme Court. The main reason for this is that all the other cases can be appealed in the lower or state court while this one "a criminal trial involving a U.S. ambassador" is the case between two nations.

3 0
3 years ago
A supercarrier is distinguished from other aircraft carriers because it is ________________ powered.
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

The answer is B. nuclear

6 0
3 years ago
I need brainliest 3 more time so i can rank up can you help
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Hi how are u?

My name is Elle

Does this help?

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an aspect of iron triangles?
densk [106]

Answer:

A symbiotic relationship among  Congressional committees, executive  agencies, and interest groups.

Explanation:

Iron triangle is a United States political term used to describe the relationship between congressional committees, bureaucracy, and interest groups when a decision needs to be made between the three.

In the iron triangle, Congress, bureaucracy and interest groups establish a partnership relationship, where each seeks to protect and benefit each other, and to assist each other in their policies and objectives. For this reason, the correct answer to your question is:  "a symbiotic relationship among  Congressional committees, executive  agencies, and interest groups."

8 0
3 years ago
Greg reasons "I can't cheat. I need a good grade but knowledge is the most important thing. I must try." Which philosophy best d
Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

Kantian Ethics

Explanation:

According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:

  • Egoism
  • Act utility
  • Rule utility
  • Kantian Ethics

In this example, Greg is employing Kantian ethics to deal with this question. Kantian ethics are an example of a deontological moral theory. This means that an act is wrong or right not based on the consequence of the act, but based on whether this act fulfills our duty or not. In this example, Greg argues that he "must try." This is the duty he has to fulfill. Therefore, the way in which he thinks about morality is based on duties, and whether these apply to him or not.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Within bowen's theory, ________________ is a term used to refer to the ability of family members to express their own individual
    7·1 answer
  • Do you think the president has too much power not enough power or just the right amount of power
    13·1 answer
  • How to promote Americanism and love for the country
    10·1 answer
  • According to the social exchange theory, what factors determine how we feel about a relationship with another person?
    6·1 answer
  • Lily is riding her bicycle and, after the fortieth mile, she has one last hill to climb. as compared with the other hills she ha
    11·1 answer
  • Help it's due in 30 minutes!!Answer if u have ever read the book Where the red fern grows.
    7·1 answer
  • A person who constantly does work for other people and does not receive credit may begin to feel __________. A. Burnout B. Catha
    14·1 answer
  • According to the hymnic opening to the homeric hymn to demeter, which god or gods does the hymn praise?.
    13·1 answer
  • y demonstrates sensitivity to the needs of the diverse academic, socioeconomic, cultural, disability and ethnic backgrounds of c
    15·1 answer
  • In a felony case, before a defendant goes to trial, who grants a verdict that there is sufficient evidence to begin prosecution
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!