Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Social inequality can be defined as an existence of unequal rewards and opportunities for different social status or classes within a group of people in a society.
Generally, social inequality is peculiar to a society that is grouped based on race, hierarchy of class, religion, culture and gender. A social inequality is characterized by unequal distribution of wealth, punishment, rewards, opportunities and goods or services to the various classes.
There are two main ways to measure social inequality, they are:
1. Inequality of conditions: refers to the unequal distribution of income, wealth, and material goods.
2. Inequality of opportunities: refers to the unequal distribution of life chances across individuals.
Answer:
The answer is:
Inelastic
Elastic
Explanation:
Nita’s demand for Coca-Cola will be relatively more inelastic i.e his demand will not be sensitive to price. Increasing the price of Coca-cola will not make Nita to change its taste because he is a devoted Coca-Cola consumer.
Becky’s demand will be relatively more elastic because he has an option to choose between Pepsi and Coca-cola.
Any increase in price of Coca-cola will make Becky to shift to Pepsi.
Answer:
B) (I) is false, (II) true.
Explanation:
Even though short term rates (Treasury bills) are much more volatile than long term rates (Treasury bonds), it is normal that the rate of return on Treasury bills is lower than the rate of return on Treasury bonds. Some of the reasons why Treasury bills have such a low rate of return is that they are very liquid investments and they don't pay any periodic interest.
Answer:
Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Elasticity of demand for Good A = −3
Percentage decrease in quantity demanded for Good A = 33%
Elasticity of demand for Good A = Percentage change in quantity demanded for Good A ÷ Percentage change in price of Good A
-3 = - 33 ÷ Percentage change in price of Good A
Percentage change in price of Good A = (-33) ÷ (-3)
= 11%
Therefore, percentage increase in price of good A is 11%.
