B, “awesome”, the student grumbled at his lunch, “fish head again”.
This is sarcasm, because the student grumbled, meaning that the student obviously don’t like the fish heads, (who does?). Therefore, the student is going against what he actually means, so it’s an example of sarcasm.
Based on the given dialogue above, the discussion technique that Daniel is clearly showing is challenging established ideas. The answer would be option A. What makes me say that this is challenging established ideas is that, the news presented above is already released in the media, and therefore, this makes the ideas established. Now, just according to Daniel's observation, he is trying to question the ideas that are given in the news. Hope this helps.
It states a universal truth about life.
I think it is a because if the banker had no money and the bet he would’ve been on debt
