How much power should the president have? On one hand, a powerful executive permits quick and decisive action, which is important for responding to current events. On the other hand, if the president gets too powerful, Congress and the people may lack the ability to hold him or her accountable.
“The Executive Department Further Considered,” written by Alexander Hamilton. In this essay, Hamilton argues that a single executive (led by one person as president, rather than several people acting as a council) is the best form for the executive branch of the United States.
He reasons that one president can act more quickly, and with more secrecy when necessary, than a larger group of leaders. He also argues that a single executive is less dangerous to democracy than a council, because it is easier to identify and remove one corrupt person than to discover who among several leaders is a bad actor.
plz mark me as brainliest :)
Answer:
True, Chinese were about 2500 years later
Explanation:
<span>better relations, allowing the USSR to begin internal reform
Reagan and Gorbachev personal relation enabled Gorbachev to convince his Kremlin communist partners on the need for perestroika and glasnost, which eventually resulted to the end of the cold war.
</span>
They worked together duhh
