Comparing and contrasting European colonization on East Africa and Central and South Africa shows:
East Africa:
- Trade gave them access to new food crops, textiles and metal
- Slave trade was not as much as other parts of Africa.
South Africa:
- Slavery was rampant.
- Impoverishment of South and Central Africans and wealth to Europeans.
<h3>How was colonization in Southern Africa different from Eastern Africa?</h3>
The colonization in Southern Africa was overall negative as Africans were taken as slaves and treated as inferior to Europeans who took most of the wealth. This was especially the case in Angola, Mozambique, and South Africa.
The East Africans were however not subjugated to much slavery and the trade in textiles and metal brought some prosperity.
Find out more on colonization in Africa at brainly.com/question/1395188
#SPJ1
A: They lived in regions where climate was markedly different
Answer:
Eastern Bloc of nations or A. Countries the favored France and Brtain
Explanation:
Europe became divided into the Eastern Bloc of nations and the West. The Eastern Bloc was led and controlled by the Soviet Union (Russia). These countries were run by communist governments and had their own alliance called the Warsaw Pact.
Well he died at 56 and died 150 years add that and you'll see how old he would be if he were still alive!!
One major impact that the Vietnam War had on the American people was that "<span>B. Americans would be hesitant to use military force overseas in the future," since this war was deemed a disaster. </span>
