Answer:
to respond to the genocide in Rwanda
Explanation:
International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States, between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1994
Answer:
No, Bronx is a country in New York.
Hope this helps
Sky
Answer:
Anti-libertairan, Anti-socialism, Exclusion of certian groups, Nationalism.
Explanation:
anti-liberalism, rejecting individual rights, civil liberties, free enterprise and democracy.
anti-socialism, rejecting economic principles based on socialist frameworks.
exclusion of certain groups, often through violence.
nationalism that seeks to expand the nation's influence and power.
A thesis statement that would not be acceptable is <u>B. The </u><u>Chesapeake </u><u>and </u><u>New England colonies </u><u>developed into</u><u> two distinct societies </u><u>based on their </u><u>geography</u><u>, </u><u>reasons </u><u>for </u><u>founding</u><u>, </u><u>economic </u><u>characteristics, and </u><u>relationships </u><u>with </u><u>American Indians.</u>
You did not include the prompt in the question but the above should be the best answer.
The New England Colonies and the Chesapeake colonies were different in that:
- New England colonies were founded to escape religious persecution while the Chesapeake colonies were founded to make profit
- New England colonies engaged in shipping, food production and lumbering whereas the Chesapeake colonies focused on tobacco.
Even though they were different in the above regard, their treatment of Native Americans was the same as they both started off with peaceful relations with the Natives which eventually deteriorated into war.
We can therefore conclude that even though they differed in several ways, they did not differ in Native treatment which would make option B wrong.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/18193023.</em>
It was "The National Assembly" that was a direct response to the king’s continued accumulation of soldiers although it should be noted that this wasn't necessarily a group that condemned the build-up, rather a group that sought alternatives.
