One way to narrow your topic by discovering the features most interesting to you is
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company are not correct, as the exclusivity contract that Koko Marius signed was not yet over.
You did not show the text to which this question refers, but through questions similar to yours, we can see that this question refers to the text presented in the figure below.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Koko Marius signed the exclusive contract with the JiMing Company of his own free will.
- This contract required the exclusivity of one year of work, which is a rational and legal period.
- In this case, Koko Marius cannot justify breaking the contract because he was seeking professional growth, as he could legally do so after a short period.
In this case, we can affirm that Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company are incorrect regarding the breach of contract, since, under the law, this breach of contract was illegal.
More information:
brainly.com/question/12790234?referrer=searchResults
