A.Simple
There is just a standard statement there, nothing complicated… it’s simple.
I inferred you are referring to this excerpt from the text;
"Most people measure their happiness in terms of physical pleasure and material possession. Could they win some visible goal which they have set on the horizon, how happy they could be! Lacking this gift or that circumstance, they would be miserable. If happiness is to be so measured, I who cannot hear or see have every reason to sit in a corner with folded hands and weep. If I am happy in spite of my deprivations, if my happiness is so deep that it is a faith, so thoughtful that it becomes a philosophy of life, — if, in short, I am an optimist, my testimony to the creed of optimism is worth hearing."
<u>Explanation</u>:
The author here uses her personal experience of been deaf-blind to assert that an individual's happiness is not dependent on his or her circumstances. Helen says "I who cannot hear or see...I am happy in spite of my deprivations if my happiness is so deep that it is a faith, so thoughtful that it becomes a philosophy of life."
We notice her use of convincing language such as when she says "my testimony to the creed of optimism is worth hearing", this language gives her message a convincing feel.
Answer:
you would have 31 apples in whole
Explanation:
Explanation:
The poet will grow bean trees at Innisfree.
Answer:
Repentant: feeling remorse to a degree marked by an extreme change.
Explanation:
The word <em>extreme </em>is a keyword here - it relates to very powerful and strong emotions caused by some kind of a change. Usually, something awful happens, or you do something really negative that affects a lot of other people, and then you feel repentant and wish that hadn't happened at all or that you could change the situation or your actions. The other options do not exhibit the same degree of regret as repentant does.
