The reason why <span>the turmoil of the French revolutionary years resulted in a conservative European reaction was because the voices of "liberty" during the Revolution quickly devolved into movements of terror, which did away with practically all of the liberty that was gained. </span>
Answer:
On the other hand, the Americans had many intangible advantages.
The British fought a war far from home. Military orders, troops, and supplies sometimes took months to reach their destinations. The British had an extremely difficult objective. They had to persuade the Americans to give up their claims of independence. As long as the war continued, the colonists' claim continued to gain validity. The geographic vastness of the colonies proved a hindrance to the British effort. Despite occupying every major city, the British remained as at a disadvantage.
Americans had a grand cause: fighting for their rights, their independence and their liberty. This cause is much more just than waging a war to deny independence. American military and political leaders were inexperienced, but proved surprisingly competent.
The war was expensive and the British population debated its necessity. In Parliament, there were many American sympathizers. Finally, the alliance with the French gave Americans courage and a tangible threat that tipped the scales in America's favor.
SOURCE: http://www.ushistory.org/us/11a.asp
John F. Kennedy believe that no matter others will do to them they will keep going no matter if "well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden" they will keep moving forward. If Americans United they will make a difference and be stronger but if they are separated they can not improve as what they wished for. He believe on "defending freedom" That everyone can make a change for their country.
Answer:
Realpolitik ("politics of reality" in German) is politics or diplomacy based on practical interests and concrete actions, without attending to theory or philosophy as elements "policy makers".
Realpolitik advocates advancing the interests of a country according to the current circumstances of its environment, instead of following philosophical, theoretical or moral principles. In this regard, he shares his philosophical approach with philosophical realism and pragmatism.
